论商标侵权的归责原则——从“耐克滑雪夹克商标侵权案”谈起

The Principle of the Fixation of Liability of Trademark Infringement: A Case Study

从“耐克滑雪夹克商标侵权案”的审判可以看出我国商标侵权归责原则规定的缺陷:现有法律对商标侵权归责原则未作明确规定,在司法实践中将元过错责任制度作为商标侵权归责的依据,其结果常常有悖法律的正义性。商标侵权应确定过错侵权归责原则,其正义性体现在:过错责任原则是平衡市场竞争关系的必然选择,是适应我国民法体系的合理选择,是与外国及国际商标权保护相契合的选择。

There is a defect about the principle of the fixation of liability in trademark infringement reflected fi＇om Nike v. Yinxing. and Cidcsport： Its not justification that no-fautt liability has been as the principle of the fixation of liability of trademark infringement in judicial practice due to no generalized norm in our taws. Doctrine of liability for wrongs should be adopted in trademark infringement for justification：Doctrine of liability for wrongs is benefit for keeping competition＇s balance,and its suited to our civil law system,and its corresponded with international trademark protection.