期刊文献+

其它可能原因的呈现方式在因果判断中的作用

The Influence of Alternative Causes' Presenting Mode on Causal Judgement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究使用不同方式呈现了其它可能原因,研究了这种不同的呈现方式对被试使用共变信息和经验信息进行因果判断的影响。研究结果表明:(1)其它可能原因的呈现方式对于因果判断有着一定的影响。当这一信息在待判断原因与结果的共变中出现、且永远存在时,被试会排除这一其它可能原因的作用,从而增强判断的信心;(2)当其它可能原因出现于待判断原因与结果的共变中、且永远存在时,被试会在一定程度上忽视经验信息的作用,更多地依赖共变信息做出判断。 The present study used two different modes to present the information about alternative causes and investigated the influence on this mode causal judgement. The results were as follows: ( 1 ) The presenting mode of alternative causes had some influence on the subjects' causal judgement. The subjects had more confidence in making sure that the candidate cause is the true cause of the effect when the information about alternative causes was presented with the information about covariation between the effect and the candidate cause. (2) In this situation, the information of covarition was more important in the judgment, and the subjects' pre-existing belief was ignored.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期654-657,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 其它可能原因 共变信息 经验信息 因果判断 alternative cause, covariation, pre-existing belief, causal judgement
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献30

  • 1Kelley, H H. The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 1973, 28: 107- 128.
  • 2Cheng, P W. From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 1997, 104: 367- 405.
  • 3Einhorn, H J , & Hogarth, R M. Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 1986, 99: 3- 19.
  • 4Cheng, P W , & Novick, L R. A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990,58 : 545 - 567.
  • 5Cheng, P W , & Novick, L R. Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 1992, 99:365 - 382.
  • 6Baker, A G , Mercier, P , Vallee- Tourangeau, F , Frank, R ,& Pan, M . Selective associations and causality judgment: Presence of a strong causal factor may reduce judgments of a weaker one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1993, 19(2):414-432.
  • 7Morris, M W , & Larrick, R P. When one cause casts doubt on another: A normative analysis of discounting in causal attribution. Psychological Review, 1995, 102(2): 331- 355.
  • 8Fugelsang, J A , & Thompson, V A. Strategy selection in causal reasoning: When beliefs and convariation collide. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2000, 54(1): 15- 32.
  • 9Jenkins H M, Ward W C. Judgement of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs, 1965, 79 : 1-17.
  • 10Cheng P W, Novick L R. A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 58 :545 - 567.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部