期刊文献+

血液分析仪白细胞分类报警阈值的ROC曲线分析 被引量:3

Analysis of blood cells differential alarm threshold values of the blood analyzer with receiver operating characteristic curve
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线对CELL-DYN 3700血液分析仪白细胞分类结果进行分析,建立本室最佳报警参考阈值。方法将238例患者静脉血标本以EDTA-K2抗凝,分别用仪器和显微镜进行白细胞分类,以SPSS 10.5统计软件的ROC曲线对5种分类参数不同阈值进行分析,选择曲线下面积(AUC)最大者为本实验室报警阈值,并与仪器设置阈值进行比较。结果经ROC曲线分析,仪器设置各参数阈值分别为中性粒细胞(N)<50%或>75%、淋巴细胞(L)<20%或>40%、单核细胞(M)>12%、嗜酸性粒细胞(E)>5%、嗜碱性粒细胞(B)>2%诊断试验整体准确性中等(AUC=0.792);当N>80%或N<20%、L>50%或L<10%、M>10%、E>5%、B>1.5%时AUC最大(AUC=0.926),诊断试验整体准确性优秀。最佳报警阈值对显微镜分类正常或异常标本判别的敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为0.91、0.90和0.91,明显优于仪器设置阈值。结论实验室应建立自己的报警阈值,以提高显微镜协同工作的有效性。 Objective To evaluate the white blood cell differential results of the blood analyzer CELL-DYN 3700 by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and establish the best alarm threshold value of our laboratory. Methods 238 venous blood samples treated with dipotassium ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid ( EDTA-K2 ) were collected. The white blood cell differential counts of each sample was performed with both the instrument and microscopy. ROC curve was used to evaluate the threshold values of the five white blood cell differential parameters. The the biggest differential threshold value of the area under the curve (AUC) was chosen as the laboratory' s differential alarm threshold value and was compared with the threshold set by the instrument. Results As was analyzed by ROC curve, the threshold values of the parameters set by the instrument were neutrophil (N) 〈 50% or 〉 75%,lymphocyte(L) 〈 20% or 〉 40% , monocyte ( M ) 〉 12% , eosinophil ( E ) 〉 5 % , basophil ( B ) 〉 2% and with these values the general accuracy of diagnosis was moderate. When the threshold values were set as N 〉 80% or N 〈 20%, L 〉 50% or L 〈 10%, M 〉 10%, E 〉5% ,B 〉 1.5% ,AUC was the biggest (AUC =0.926) and the general accuracy of diagnosis was optimal. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the optimal alarm threshold values were 0. 91,0.90 and 0.91 in judgment of the normal and the abnormal samples. Conclusions Setting up appropriate alarm threshold values in the laboratory can improve cooperation efficiency of instrumental and microscopical determination.
出处 《检验医学》 CAS 北大核心 2006年第3期265-268,共4页 Laboratory Medicine
关键词 受试者工作特征曲线 白细胞 血液分析仪 报警阈值 Receiver operating characteristic curve White blood cell Blood analyzer Alarm threshold value
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1李顺义.应重视血常规检验中的形态学观察[J].中华医学检验杂志,1999,22(1):22-23. 被引量:74
  • 2张之南.血液病诊断及疗效标准[M].天津科学技术出版社,1999.172.
  • 3叶应妩.全国临床检验操作规程(第2版)[M].东南大学出版社,1991.452-465.
  • 4Harris N,Jou JM,Devoto G,et al.Performance evaluation of the ADVIA 2120 hematology analyzer:an international multicenter clinical tria[J].Lab Hematol,2005,11:62-70.
  • 5Kondo H,Akiyama T,Tatsumi N,et al.Performance evaluation of the complete blood count and white blood cell differential parameters obtained using a celltac F automated hematology analyzer[J].Lab Hematol,2004,10:3-13.
  • 6Kendall R,Benoit E,Bogiages J,et al.Performance evaluation of the Abbott Cell-Dyn 1800 automated hematology analyzer[J].Lab Hematol,2003,9:143-152.
  • 7邓明凤 王昌富 李莉.选择性显微镜检查对仪器法白细胞分类计数的质量保证[J].实用医学检验杂志,1996,3:24-26.
  • 8熊立凡,王鸿利.循证检验医学能为临床医学提供决策和证据[J].中国实验诊断学,2004,8(1):82-85. 被引量:18

二级参考文献3

共引文献115

同被引文献18

  • 1艾红梅,肖秀林,王昌富,邓明凤.血细胞分析仪异常细胞警示与镜检的比较分析[J].国际检验医学杂志,2006,27(2):183-184. 被引量:7
  • 2Jones RG,Faust AM,Mattehews RA. Quality team approach in evaluating three automated hematology analyzers with five-part differential capability [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 1995,103 (2):159- 166.
  • 3Grimaldi E,Scopacasa F. Evaluation of the Abbott Cell-Dyn 4000 hematology analyzer[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2000, 113 (4) :497- 505.
  • 4Picard F,Gicquel C,Marnet L,et al. Preliminary evaluation of the new hematology analyzer COULTER? GEN-S in a university hospital [J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 1999,37(6):681-686.
  • 5Amouroux I,Bala YM,Marfaing KA. Evaluation of the blood analyzer Beckman Coulter L H 750: analytic performance, decision rules [J]. Ann Biol Clin(Paris) ,2003,61(5) :576-584.
  • 6The ICSH expert panel on cytometry. International Council for Standardization in Haematology. Guidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analyzer including those used for differential leukocyte and reticulocyte counting and cell marker application [J]. Clin Lab Haemat, 1994,16(1):157-174.
  • 7National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Leukocyte Differential Counting NCCLS Approved Standard H20-A2[S]. Villanova,PA, 1992.
  • 8National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference leukocyte differential count (proportional) and evaluation of instrument methods; approved standard. NCCLS Document H20-A[S]. NCCLS,Wayne, USA,1992.
  • 9张之南.血液病诊断及疗效标准[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.270-271.
  • 10Barnes PW, McFadden SL, Machin SL,et al. The international con- sensus group for hematology review : suggested criteria for action follow- ing automated CBC and WBC differential analysis [ J ]. Lab Hematol, 2005, 11(2) : 83 -90.

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部