期刊文献+

论自然语言在语言哲学中的元语言地位 被引量:3

On the Metalinguistic Position of Natural Languages in Language Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自然语言的精确性和完善性问题不是语言哲学中元语言的根本问题。元语言的根本问题是表达和解释的初始性,自然语言是最初始的元语言。自然语言自身解释存在内部循环,所以需要确定核心语符和核心规则。核心语符和核心规则是通过对部分言语片段的平行周遍对比获得的,是不可解释和定义的。怎样确定核心语符和核心规则需要作深入研究。 Accuracy and perfection of natural languages is not an essential task of metalanguage in language philosophy. On the contrary, the essential task of metalanguage is to explore the originality of expression and explanation, and the natural language is the original metalanguage. The natural language has interiorlycirculating self-explanation, which calls for an established system of common symbols and rules. And this system of common symbols and rules is obtained by parallelly and universally comparing some bits and pieces of speech, thus non-explanable and non-definable. So a deeper and further study is to be done to establish the system of common symbols and rules.
作者 陈保亚
机构地区 北京大学中文系
出处 《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第3期41-45,共5页 Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 元语言 内部循环 语言哲学 核心规则 核心语符 metalanguage interior circulation language philosophy common rules common symbols
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1[英]维特根斯坦 郭英译.逻辑哲学论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1962..
  • 2BLOOMFIELD, L., A set of postulates for the science of language[J]. Language Vol. 2, 1926.
  • 3陆志韦.汉语构词法[A]..陆志韦语言学著作选(三)[M].北京:中华书局,1990..
  • 4CHOMSKY, N. ,Aspects of th Theory of Syntax [M].Cambridge, MIT Press, 1965.
  • 5CHOMSKY, N., Remarks on nominalization [ A ]. in R.Jacobs & P, Rosenbaum, eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar[ M ], Ginn, Waltham,Mass, 1970, pp184 - 221.
  • 6HARRIS, Z. S., Methods in Structural Linguistics[M]. The University of Chicago Press, 1951.
  • 7[德]海德格尔 孙周兴 译.在通向语言的途中[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997..
  • 8[德]海德格尔著.存在与时间[M].生活·读书·新知三联书店,1987..
  • 9[英]维特根斯坦 陈嘉映 译.哲学研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001.232.
  • 10陈保亚.语言哲学的文本解释与结构解释——从虚拟语态看中西方哲学思维取向[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,39(6):28-37. 被引量:9

共引文献21

同被引文献26

  • 1Barwise, K. J. & J. Etchemendy ( 1987 ) The Liar : An Essay in Truth and Circtdarity, Stanford University Press.
  • 2Barwise, K. J. & J. Perry(1983) Situations and Attitudes , Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • 3Burge, T. (1979)Semantic Paradox, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 76.
  • 4Chen, Baoya (2001)An Analysis of the Conceptions of Language in the Twentieth-Century' s Philosophy of Language, Contemporary Chinese Thought, Spring 2001/Vol. 32, No. 3, USA.
  • 5Gupta, A. & N. Belnap (1998) The Revision Theory of Truth, Cambridge : The MIT Press.
  • 6Herzberger, H. G., 1982, Naive Semantics and Liar Paradox, The Journal of Phylosopy, Vol. 79.
  • 7克莱因.(1981).《古今数学思想》(第4册).北京大学数学系数学史翻译组译.上海科学技术出版社.
  • 8Koons, R. (1992) Paradoxes of Belief and Strategic Rationality, Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Kripke, S. (1973)Outline of the theory of truth, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 72.
  • 10Russell, B. ( 1903 ) The Principles of Mathematics, George Allen and Unwin.

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部