期刊文献+

郭象认识论辨析 被引量:1

A Discriminative Analysis of Guo Xiang's Epistemology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 郭象的认识论历来被视为神秘主义的不可知论,原因在于他主张既忘其迹又忘其所以迹的“冥而忘迹”论。这样理解郭象的认识论当然是不对的,因为这只仅仅看到了其认识论思想的一个方面,而且对这一个方面作了表面的、片面的理解。考察郭象在《庄子注》中关于认识问题的论述,他的认识论思想有三个方面,“冥而忘迹”论只是其中之一。从郭象认识论思想这三个方面的统一来理解他的“冥而忘迹”说,它并不神秘,且这个“忘”的认识论与郭象的“独化于玄冥之境”的“独化”本体论有内在的一致性。郭象的“独化”本体论实质上并不是一种逻辑分析式的理论和方法,而是一种显现、现象性的境域,它需要的是象性思维。 Guo Xiang's epistemology is always regarded as a sort of mysticism and know-nothingism because he took an "ignorance-and- negligence" view. This understanding of Guo's epistemology can't hold water, for it resulted from viewing and superfluously and partially understanding only one aspect of his theory. In fact, Guo' s view of epistemology embodies three aspects, one of which is "ignorance-and-negligence". If we see his view of "ignorance- and negligence" in terms of an agreemenet of the three aspects, Guo's view is by no means mysticism. Guo Xiang's ontology of "individualization" is not a theory or methodology of logical analysis, but an overt and phenomenal realm, which calls for thinking in images.
作者 康中乾
出处 《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第3期58-63,共6页 Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 郭象 唯言随物 寄言出意 冥而忘迹 象思维 Guo Xiang reference with object symbol as indicator of meaning ignorance-and-negligence thinking in images
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1郭象.庄子注[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983..
  • 2郭庆藩.庄子集释[M].北京:中华书局,1961..

共引文献448

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部