摘要
近年来,理论上“只有‘调审分离’才能治愈我国民事诉讼痼疾”的观点几近共识、实践中庭审功能得到过分强调,这种情况下最高法院出台《调解规定》①重新强调法院调解,表明我国民事司法改革的理论与实践都存在偏差。本文试图论证法院调解与判决在我国民事诉讼中具有相同本质,法院调解危机的实质是“调审合一”论对我国民事诉讼本质的错误解说及其指导下的民事司法改革对西方诉讼理念及制度的部分引入所引起的混乱。
Rule of court mediation shows that the theoretical hypothesis that court mediation and judgment are juxtaposed modes of trial in civil procedural system and the practices of judicial reform are wrong. In this paper, the author deals with not only the essence of court mediation, but also its crisis.
出处
《浙江工商大学学报》
2006年第1期59-66,共8页
Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
关键词
调解规定
法院调解
司法改革
rule of court mediation
court mediation
judicial reform
