期刊文献+

高血压危险因素logistic回归与分类树分析 被引量:29

Logistic regression and classification tree analysis on risk factors of hypertension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的应用分类树模型分析广东省居民高血压的危险因素,并与logistic回归分析结果做比较。方法利用广东省2002年居民营养与健康状况调查数据,用分类树分析和logistic回归分析15 343名常住居民高血压的危险因素。结果高血压的主要危险因素为年龄、血脂及肥胖。分类树学习集的灵敏度为91.0%,特异度为81.6%,总正确率为83.3%,约登指数为0.726;检验集的灵敏度为83.8%,特异度为80.5%,总正确率为81.2%,约登指数为0.643。logisic回归分析的灵敏度为31.6%,特异度为95.7%,总正确率为84.5%,约登指数为0.273。结论对高血压患者,尤其是老年人,要调节血脂,减轻体重。分类树分析较logisic回归分析分类效果好,结果直观,便于解释。 Objective To analyse the risk factors of hypertension using the methods of classification tree and logistic regression analysis and to compare the results of these two methods. Methods A crosssectional analysis on hypertension was conducted using the data of 15 343 inhabits from the Inhabits Nutrition and Health Survey in Guangdong province in 2002. Results The important risk factors of hypertension were age, cholesteri and obesity. In classification tree analysis on hypertension, Youden's index for learning samples was 0. 726 (sensitivity was 91.0% and specificity was 81.6% ), and 0. 643 (sensitivity was 83.8% and specificity was 80.5% ) for testing samples. Youden' s index of logistic regression analysis was 0. 273 (sensitivity was 31.6 % and specificity was 95.7 % ). Conclusions For hypertensives (especially the elder), keeping proper cholesteri concentration and weight were necessary. Compared with logistic regression model, classification tree model could help to judge the controls and patients better, and present the results more easily and understandably.
出处 《疾病控制杂志》 CAS 2006年第3期256-259,共4页 Chinese Journal of Disease Control and Prevention
关键词 高血压 回归分析 危险因素 Hypertension Regression analysis Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献1

  • 1赵一鸣,药物流行病学杂志,1997年,6卷,增刊,69页

共引文献969

同被引文献230

引证文献29

二级引证文献176

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部