摘要
我科自1985年5月至1995年3月,用ELF及FAM方案治疗晚期胃癌57例,其中ELF组25例,FAM组32例。疗效分别为56%(14/25)和31.25%(10/32),完全缓解率为12%(3/25)和12.5%(4/32)。恶心呕吐的Ⅲ级毒性发生率:ELF组为0%,FAM组为25%(8/32);口腔粘膜Ⅱ级以上毒性发生率:ELF组为44%(11/25),FAM组为0%;ELF组未见心脏毒性,而FAM为12.5%。两者疗效无统计学差异(P>0.01)。恶心呕吐发生率FAM方案明显大于ELF方案(P<0.025),而ELF组的口腔炎发生率明显高于FAM组(P<0.001)。结果表明ELF方案更适合于不能耐受强烈化疗或存在基础心脏疾病的进展期胃癌患者。
Fifty seven cases with advanced gastric carcinoma were treated with ELF or FAM regimen from May 1985 to March 1995. The response rate of 25 cases with the ELF was 56%(14/25),and that of 32 cases with the FAM was 31. 25 % (10/32). CR rate was 12% (3/25) and 12. 5% (4/32) respectively. Nausea and vomiting above WHO' S grade Ⅲ occurred in 0case in the FAM group,and & cases (25 % ) in the FAM group, Stomatitis above grade Ⅱ incidence was 44% (11/25) in the ELF and 0% in the FAM. Heart toxicity was not found in the ELF,but incidence was 12. 5% in the FAM. With a statistical analysis,there was not any significant difference in respomse rate. Incidence of nausea and vomiting in the FAM was Higher than that in the ELF(P<0. 025),but that of stomatitis was higher in the ELF than in the FAM (P<0. 001). These results showed that the ELF is a more suitable regimen for pa tients with advanced gastric carcinoma who cannot accept intensive chemotherapy because of having a heart disease or a poor performence status.
出处
《河南肿瘤学杂志》
1996年第1期55-57,共3页
Henan Journal of Oncology
关键词
晚期
胃癌
ELF方案
FAM方案
治疗
advenced gastric carcinoma
ELF chemotherapy
FAM chemotherapy