期刊文献+

不同浓度乙醇腹腔神经丛阻滞治疗上腹部癌痛的临床观察 被引量:6

Clinical observation on upper abdominal pain caused by cancer after neurolytic celiac plexus block with different-concentration alcohol.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察不同浓度乙醇腹腔神经丛阻滞术时晚期上腹部癌性疼痛患者的治疗效果。方法96例晚期上腹部癌痛患者随机分为50%乙醇组、75%乙醇组和无水乙醇组,每组32例,X线引导下分别于背侧入路实施经皮疆腔神经丛阻滞术,止痛效果被分为0~Ⅲ级,分别于术后2周、1个月、2个月及3个月时采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)观察止痛效果。结果随访观察3个月,治疗后2周,1个月、2个月及3个月时用75%乙醇组和无水乙醇组的显效率和总有效率显著高于50%乙醇组。而75%乙醇组与无水乙醇组比较,显效率和总有效率差异无统计学差异。结论经皮腹腔神经丛75%乙醇和无水乙醇(15ml)阻滞治疗晚期上腹部癌性疼痛是一种安全、有效的方法。 Objective To study the therapeutic effect for intractable upper abdominal pain caused by cancer after neurolytic celiac plexus block(NCPB) with different-concentration alcohol.Methods Ninty-six patients who had intractable upper abdominal pain resulted from malignancies were randomized into 50 % alcohol group, 75 % alcohol group, dehydrated alcohol group.All the patients received neurolytic celiac plexus blocks through posterior-lateral approach under X-Ray guidance.The results of pain relief classitied 0 - Ⅲ grade were evaluated by visual analog scale(VAS) in 2 weeks, l month,2 months and 3 months. Results During the 3 months followup, the excellence rate and total effective rates pain relief in 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months were distinctly lower in 50% alcohol group than those in 75% alcohol group and dehydrated alcohol group( P 〈 0.01), but there were no significant differences between 75 % alcohol group and dehydrated alcohol group in the effective rates and the total effective rates pain relief. Conclusion NCPB with 75 % or dehydrated ( 15ml)alcohol is an effective and safe modality in the management of intractable pain resulted from advanced abdominal malignancies.
出处 《四川医学》 CAS 2006年第6期612-614,共3页 Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词 腹腔神经丛阻滞 乙醇 癌痛 heurolytic celiac plexus block alcohol cancer pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献14

共引文献69

同被引文献30

  • 1倪家骧,郭玉娜,任玉娥,刘凤玲,姜达.CT引导下腹腔神经丛毁损术治疗慢性顽固性腹部癌痛[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2004,10(4):198-199. 被引量:11
  • 2周正丽,明登富,范宏.行腹腔神经丛阻滞术治疗上腹部癌性疼痛[J].局解手术学杂志,2006,15(1):53-54. 被引量:3
  • 3黄冰,沈纪林,郑汉光,周煦燕,侯健,陆雅萍,孙建良.双针会师法腹腔丛阻滞对顽固性上腹部癌痛患者的镇痛作用[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(11):1032-1035. 被引量:18
  • 4熊根玉,张达颖,刘炎玲.疼痛评估记录方法与临床管理研究[J].中国实用护理杂志,2007,23(5):57-58. 被引量:35
  • 5Eisenberg E, Cart DB, Chalmers TC et al. Neurolytic celiac plexus block for treatment of cancer pain : A meta nalysis [ J ]. Anesth Analg,1995,80(7) :290.
  • 6Polati E, Finco G, Gottin L, et al. Prospective randomized double- blind trial of neurolytic coeliac plexus block in patients with pancreatic cancer[J]. Br J Surg,1998,85(2) :199.
  • 7Jan JR, Maciej H. Efficacy of neurolytic celiac plexus block in varying locations of pancreatic cancer [ J].Anesthesiology, 2000,92 (2) :347.
  • 8Pallat A, Ashford A, Dolin SJ. Coeliac plexus block using computed tomography guidance [ J]. Palliat Med, 1999,13 ( 5 ) :419.
  • 9Ina H, Kitoh T, Kobayashi M, et al. New technique for the neurolytic celiac plexus block:the transintervertebral between disc approach [ J]. Anesthesiology, 1996,85 ( 1 ) :212-217.
  • 10Akhan O, Altinor D, Ozmen MN, et al. Correlation between the grade of tumoral invasion and pain relief in patients with celiac ganglia block [J]. AJR, 1997,168 (6) : 1565-1567.

引证文献6

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部