理性危机与表征难题的实践解决

Practice as the Solution to Rational Crisis and Representation Problem

传统科学实在论与科学的社会建构共享着表征主义的科学观。表征主义使“实在论与反实在论”之争陷入了一种“理性的危机”,即传统的科学哲学实在论把科学家看成是“理性傀儡”或“规范傀儡”,社会建构主义则把科学家变成了“利益傀儡”,结果使科学研究陷入不可自拔的认识是否能够真实地反映实在的“方法论的恐惧”之中。用作为实践和文化的科学,取代作为知识的表征的科学,给与“实在”以动态的、生成的、过程的解释,是消解这类“危机”,并拯救科学的社会建构理论的批判成果的可行途径。

Both traditional science realism and social constructivism share the same representativism,that leads the debate of 'realism vs antirealism' to the 'rational crisis'.Traditional science realism treats scientists as 'rational dope' and social constructivism treats scientists as 'interest dope'.Their common representivism presupposition results science research deeply plunge into the 'methodological horror' that worries about whether or not the cognition could reflect the world truthfully.