期刊文献+

头孢丙烯在下呼吸道细菌感染患者的药代动力学研究 被引量:5

The pharmacokinetics study of cefprozil in patients with low respiratory tract bacterial infections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过研究下呼吸道细菌感染患者的头孢丙烯临床药代动力学参数,为临床选择合理给药方案提供依据。方法:用HPLC法测定10例下呼吸道细菌感染患者连续给药5d后的稳态血药浓度,数据用3P97 药物动力学模拟系统处理。结果:头孢丙烯的药时曲线符合二室开放模型,主要药代动力学参数:t1/2为 (1.55±0.17)h,MRT为(2.52±0.15)h,Cmax为(13.32±1.28)μg/mL,tmax为(1.41±0.31)h,AUC0-10为 (31.68±7.68)μg h/mL。结论:口服头孢丙烯片500mg,每天2次,能获得控制下呼吸道细菌感染的有效治疗浓度。 Objective:To offer the evidence for reasonable dosage regimen by the pharmacokineties study of cefprozil in patients with low respiratory tract hacterial infections. Methods:The cefprozil concentration in plasma was determined by the high performance liquid chromatography method, The pharmaeokinetic parameters were obtained by using 3P97 imitate program. Results:With oral multipie - dose of 500mg of cefprozil twice over 5 consecutive days, the main pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from the patients were as follows:t1/2 was ( 1.55 ±0.17)h ,MRT was (2.52 ±0.15) h,Cmax , was ( 13.32 ± 1.28) μg/mL,t was ( 1.41 ±0.31 )h ,AUC0-10 was ( 31.68 ± 7.68) μg · h/mL. Conclusions: Conclusions 500mg, hid orally may be effective against low respiratory tract bacterial infect infcctions.
作者 刘新宇 吴芳
出处 《药学实践杂志》 CAS 2006年第3期144-146,共3页 Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice
关键词 头孢丙烯 药代动力学 高效液相色谱法 下呼吸道细菌感染 cefprozil pharmacokineties HPLC low respiratory tract bacterial infections
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献22

  • 1王建平,辛洪涛,郑秀兰.头孢克洛治疗呼吸道感染的临床试验[J].新药与临床,1994,13(5):267-269. 被引量:7
  • 2雷招宝.新的口服头孢菌素——头孢普齐[J].中国新药杂志,1994,3(5):24-26. 被引量:3
  • 3何平,马宗生.希刻劳治疗呼吸道细菌性感染102例临床观察[J].中国实用内科杂志,1996,16(8):474-474. 被引量:2
  • 4戴自英 刘裕昆 汪复.实用抗菌药物学[M](第2版)[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1997.153-160.
  • 5Guay DRP.Cefdinir:An advanced—generation,broad—spectrum oral cephalosporin.Clin Ther,2002,24(1):473.
  • 6Wiseman LR, Benfield P. Cefprozil, A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinefic properties, and therapeutic potential. Drugs, 1993,45 (2) :295.
  • 7Fung- Tome JC, Huezko Z, Stickle T, et al. Antibacterial activities of cefprozil compared with those of 13 oral cephems and 3 macrolides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1995,39 ( 2 ) : 533.
  • 8Bonnet JP, Ginsberg D, Nolen TM,et al.Cefprozil vs.cefuroxime axetil in mild to moderate lower respiratory tract infections: A focus on bronchitis[J].Infect Med,1992, 9(Suppl E):48.
  • 9Fung Tomc JC, Huczko E, Stickle T,et al.Antibacterial activities of cefprozil compared with those of 13 oral cephems and 3 macrolides[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1995,39:533.
  • 10Thornsberry C.Review of the in vitro antibacterial activity of cefprozil, a new oral antibiotic [J].Clin Infect Dis,1992,14(Suppl 2):189.

共引文献50

同被引文献32

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部