摘要
张竹坡与文龙就吴月娘、孟玉楼、庞春梅三个人物形象的驳难,寄寓彼此对时世的慨叹,灌注各自的主体精神。在小说评点学史上,张竹坡、文龙都自觉地探讨小说评点的艺术规律,促进小说评点学的自我发展。张竹坡曲笔写意,又能自出心思;文龙有意避免运用反讽,注重对文本的探讨。考究张竹坡、文龙二人的小说评点话语歧异,对反讽文法的参透程度当为影响二人评点话语差异的一个重要原因。
The arguments on Wu Yue-niang,Meng Yu-Lou and Pang Chun-mei place information and comments on the times, imbuing with their spirits. In the academic commentary on novel, Zhang Zhu-po and Wen Long explored the artistic law consciously and accelerated the development of this study. Carrying on Jin's regulation, Zhang could express deliberately and convey his own ideas. Owing to his avoiding irony consciously, using scarcely the satirical grammars, Wen Long's commentaries were close to the essence of the characters. Judged from the differences between Zhang's and Wen's, the critical reason maybe the grammars of Irony and Satire.
出处
《中北大学学报(社会科学版)》
2006年第3期25-28,33,共5页
Journal of North University of China:Social Science Edition