期刊文献+

Electroencephalogram and evoked potential parameters examined in Chinese mild head injury patients for forensic medicine 被引量:1

Electroencephalogram and evoked potential parameters examined in Chinese mild head injury patients for forensic medicine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective To evaluate the usefulness of quantitative electroencephalogram (QEEG),flash visual evoked potential (F-VEP) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR) as indicators of general neurological status. Methods Com-parison was conducted on healthy controls (N=30) and patients with brain concussion (N=60) within 24 h after traumatic brain injury. Follow-up study of patient group was completed with the same standard paradigm 3 months later. All participants were recorded in multi-modality related potential testing in both early and late concussion at the same clinical setting. Glasgow coma scale,CT scanning,and physical examinations of neuro-psychological function,optic and auditory nervous system were performed before electroencephalogram (EEG) and evoked potential (EEG–EP) testing. Any partici-pants showed abnormal changes of clinical examinations were excluded from the study. Average power of frequency spectrum and power ratios were selected for QEEG testing,and latency and amplitude of F-VEP and ABR were recorded. Results Between patients and normal controls,the results indicated: (1) Highly significance (P < 0.01) in average power of α1 and power ratios of θ/α1,θ/α2,α1/α2 of EEG recording; (2) N70-P100 amplitude of F-VEP in significant difference at early brain concussion; and (3) apparent prolongation of I^III inter-peak latency of ABR appeared in some individuals at early stage after concussion. The follow-up study showed that some patients with concussion were also afflicted with characteristic changes of EEG components for both increments of α1 average power and θ/α2 power ratio after 3 months recording. Conclusion EEG testing has been shown to be more effective and sensitive than evoked potential tests alone on detecting functional state of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). Increments of α1 average power and θ/ α2 power ratio are the sensitive EEG parameters to determining early concussion and evaluating outcome of post-concussion symptoms (PCS). Follow-up study associated with persistent PCS may be consistent with the postulate of substantial biological,rather than psychological origin. The study suggests that combination of EEG and EP parameters can contribute to the evaluation of brain function as a whole for clinical and forensic applications. Objective To evaluate the usefulness of quantitative electroencephalogram (QEEG), flash visual evoked potential (F-VEP) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR) as indicators of general neurological status. Methods Comparison was conducted on healthy controls (N=30) and patients with brain concussion (N=60) within 24 h after traumatic brain injury. Follow-up study of patient group was completed with the same standard paradigm 3 months later. All participants were recorded in multi-modality related potential testing in both early and late concussion at the same clinical setting. Glasgow coma scale, CT scanning, and physical examinations of neuro-psychological function, optic and auditory nervous system were performed before electroencephalogram (EEG) and evoked potential (EEG-EP) testing. Any participants showed abnormal changes of clinical examinations were excluded from the study. Average power of frequency spectrum and power ratios were selected for QEEG testing, and latency and amplitude of F-VEP and ABR were recorded. Results Between patients and normal controls, the results indicated: (1) Highly significance (P 〈 0.01) in average power of α1 and power ratios of θ/α1, 0/α2, α1/α2 of EEG recording; (2) N70-P 100 amplitude of F-VEP in significant difference at early brain concussion; and (3) apparent prolongation of Ⅰ~Ⅲ inter-peak latency of ABR appeared in some individuals at early stage after concussion. The follow-up study showed that some patients with concussion were also afflicted with characteristic changes of EEG components for both increments of α1 average power and θ/α2 power ratio after 3 months recording. Conclusion EEG testing has been shown to be more effective and sensitive than evoked potential tests alone on detecting functional state of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). Increments of α1 average power and θ/α2 power ratio are the sensitive EEG parameters to determining early concussion and evaluating outcome of postconcussion symptoms (PCS). Follow-up study associated with persistent PCS may be consistent with the postulate of substantial biological, rather than psychological origin. The study suggests that combination of EEG and EP parameters can contribute to the evaluation of brain function as a whole for clinical and forensic applications.
出处 《Neuroscience Bulletin》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2006年第3期165-170,共6页 神经科学通报(英文版)
基金 This work was supported in part by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30571909) China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 32134006) Foundation of Soozhow University (No. Q4134405).
关键词 脑电图 电位 脑损伤 中医治疗 mild traumatic brain injury concussion patients electroencephalogram evoked potentials forensic
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Ruff R.Two decades of advances in understanding of mild traumatic brain injury.J Head Trauma Rehabil 2005,20:5-18.
  • 2Mangels JA,Craik FI,Levine B,et al.Effects of divided attention on episodic memory in chronic traumatic brain injury:a function of severity and strategy.Neuropsychologia 2002,40:2369-2385.
  • 3Wood RL.Understanding the "miserable minority":a diasthesisstress paradigm for post-concussional syndrome.Brain Inj 2004,18:1135-1153.
  • 4Fenton GW.The postconcussional syndrome reappraised.Clin Electroencephalogr 1996,27:174-182.
  • 5Pelczar M,Politynska B.Pathogenesis and psychosocial consequences of post-concussion syndrome.Neurol Neurochir Pol 1997,31:989-998.
  • 6Gaetz M,Bernstein DM.The current status of electrophysiologic procedures for the assessment of mild traumatic brain injury.J Head Trauma Rehabil 2001,16:386-405.
  • 7Mazzini L.Clinical applications of event-related potentials in brain injury.Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2004,15:163-175.
  • 8Misic-Pavkov G,Bozic K.Subjective syndrome after head injury.Med Pregl 1998,51:41-44.
  • 9Lynch WJ.Determination of effort level,exaggeration,and malingering in neurocognitive assessment.J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004,19:277-283.
  • 10Pfurtscheller G,Schwarz G,List W.Long-lasting EEG reactions in comatose patients after repetitive stimulation.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986,64:402-410.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部