期刊文献+

地拉普利与卡托普利治疗原发性高血压的比较 被引量:5

Delapril vs captopril in treating essential hypertension
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探索地拉普利治疗原发性高血压病的疗效。方法:原发性高血压病人30例(男性16例,女性14例:年龄62±s11a)采用地拉普利15~60mg,po,bid,共4wk为地拉普利组。另设对照组30例(男性17例,女性13例;年龄65±9a)采用卡托普利12.5~25mg,po,bid或tid共4wk为卡托普利组。结果:地拉普利组剂量30~60mg/d,总有效率87%,增加剂量未见疗效增加;卡托普利组总有效率90%,组间经Ridit分析法检验:P>0.05。2组副作用均轻微。结论:地拉普利治疗原发性高血压的疗效好,且安全。 AIM: To study the efficacy of delapril in treating essential hypertension. METHODS: Essential hypertension (EH) 30 patients (M 16, F 14; age 62±s 11 a) received delapril 15-60 mg, po,bid for 4 wk; while 30 patients with EH (M 17, F 13; age 65±9 a) received captopril 12.5-25 mg, po, bid or tid for 4 wk. RESULTS: The total response rate of delapril (30-60 mg/d) group 87%, was similar to that in captopril group 90% (P>0.05), when delapril dosage was increased to 120 mg/d, the theraputic effect was not correspondingly increased. In the 2 groups the side effects were mild. CONCLUSION: Delapril is an effective and safe drug in the therapy of EH.
作者 姜启谦 李青
出处 《新药与临床》 CSCD 北大核心 1996年第2期71-73,共3页
关键词 地拉普利 卡托普利 高血压 delapril captopril hypertension blood pressure monitors
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1匿名著者,中华心血管病杂志,1979年,7卷,81页

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部