从刘向校书再论马王堆帛书《老子》乙本卷前古佚书非《黄帝四经》——兼论古籍流传研究中的两个方法论误区

FROM COLLATION OF LIUXIANG, REDISCUSSION OF THE LOST PART OF LAO ZI APPEARED IN BOOKS COPIED ON SILK OF MA WANGDUI TO FOUR WORKS OF HUANGDI: On Two Mistakes of Methodology in Research on Spread of the Ancient Workes

从刘向校书与古籍流传之间关系来看,应以“类”的观念对待刘向校书前的诸子文献。将新出土的汉代中期以前的简帛文献比附《汉书·艺文志》相关篇目、以线性的逻辑模式处理刘向之前或其同时代的互见文献,是目前古籍流传和学术史研究中两个比较常见的方法论误区。因此在马王堆帛书《老子》乙本卷前古佚书非《黄帝四经》问题上没有讨论余地,这种思路本身就不可取。

From view of the relation between the collation of Liuxiang and spread of the ancient works, we should tread these documents before the collation of Liuxiang with the concept of ＂classification＂. Taking books copied on silk which was unearthed in the middle time of the Han Dynasty comparing with the related contents in Yi Wen Zhi of Hart Book and treading the documents before the time of Liuxiang with the line logic pattern are two mistakes of methodology. Therefore, there is no doubt that the lost parts ofLoo Zi appeared in books copied on silk ofWa Wangdui are no belong the Four Works of Huangdi.