期刊文献+

ProMACE-CytaBOM方案治疗难治性及复发中高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的对照研究 被引量:2

Randomized controlled study of proMACE-CytaBOM regimen in treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate and high grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察ProMACE CytaBOM方案治疗复发及难治性中高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(non Hodgkin’slymphoma,NHL)的临床疗效及毒副反应,并与DICE方案比较。方法:41例复发及难治性中高度恶性NHL患者随机分为两组:治疗组20例,采用Pro MACE CytaBOM方案治疗;对照组21例,采用DICE方案治疗。结果:治疗组与对照组两组CR率分别为35.0%和28.6%,χ2=0.196,P=0.658;两组总有效率分别为70.0%和71.4%,χ2=0.010,P=0.920;经过中位15个月(5~27个月)的随访,两组1、2年总生存率及中位生存期分别为65.0%、34.7%、19个月和64.8%、34.6%、16个月,χ2=0.210,P=0.645;两组1、2年无疾病进展生存率及中位疾病进展时间分别为40.0%、11.4%、11个月和41.9%、17.4%、11个月,χ2=0.000,P=0.964,差异均无统计学意义。两组毒副反应亦相似。结论:ProM ACE CytaBOM方案是复发及难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的一个有效的解救治疗方案。 OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical effect and toxicity of ProMACE-CytaBOM regimen in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate and high grade Non-Hodgkin' s Lymphoma, compared with DICE regimen. METHODS: Forty-one patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate and high grade Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomly divided into two groups: 20 cases in treatment group treated with ProMACE-CytaBOM regimen, 21eases in compared group treated with DICE regimen. RESULT: The difference of complete response rate and response rate between the treatment group and the compared group were not significant (35.0% vs 28.6%,X^2=0. 196,P=0.658; 70.0% vs 71.4%,X^2 =0.010, P= 0. 920 respectively). With a median follow up of 15 months (ranged from 5-27 ranged), the 1-, 2-year survival and median survival time for the two groups was 65.0%, 34. 7%, 19 months and 64. 8%, 34. 6%, 16 months respectively (X^2 =0. 210, P=0. 645); the 1-, 2- year progress free survival and median time to progress was 40.0 %, 11.4%, 11 months and 41.9%, 17. 4%, 11 months respectively (X^2 =0. 000,P=0. 964). The toxicity of the two groups was similar. CONCLUSIONS: ProMACE-CytaBOM regimen is an effective saving regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate and high grade non- Hodgkin' s lymphoma.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 2006年第8期618-620,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 淋巴瘤 非霍奇金/药物疗法 抗肿瘤联合化疗方案/治疗应用 复发 lymphoma, non-hodgkin/drug therapy antineoplatic combined chemotherapy protocols/therapeutic use recurrence
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1Messori A, Vaiani M, Trippoli S, et al. Survival in patients with intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma:meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing third generation regimens with CHOP [J]. Cancer, 2001,84(3): 303-307.
  • 2Multani P, White CA, Grillo-Lopez A. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: review of conventional treatments [J]. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 2001,2(4): 279-291.
  • 3Laport GF, Williams SF. The role of high-dose chemotherapy in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [J]. Semin Oncol, 1998,25(4) :503-517.
  • 4Coiffier B. Effective immunocheotherapy for aggressive nonHodgkin's lymphoma [J]. Semin Oncol, 2004,31 (1 Suppl 2):7-11.
  • 5Gisselbrecht C, Mounier N. Improing second-line therapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [J]. Semin Oncol, 2004,31 (1 Suppl 2): 12-16.
  • 6Kimby E, Brandt L, Nygren P, et al. A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma[J]. Acta Oncol, 2001,40(2-3): 198-212.
  • 7Goss PE. New perspectives in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [J]. Semin Oncol, 1992, 19(6 Suppl 12) :23-30.
  • 8Loehrer PJ Sr, Laurer R, Roth B J, et al. Salvage therapy in recurrent germ cell cancer: ifosfamide and cisplatin plus either vinblastine or etoposide [J]. Ann Intern Med, 1988,109(7):540-546.
  • 9Haim N, Rosenblatt E, Wollner M, et al. Salvage therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a combination of dexamethasone,etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin [J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1992,30 (3): 243-244.
  • 10Haim N, Ben-Shahar M, Faraggi D, et al. Dexamethasone,etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin as second-line therapy in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [J]. Cancer,1997,80(10): 1989-1996.

共引文献32

同被引文献23

  • 1戴建荣,傅卫华,胡逸民.应用超全向楔形板概念设计治疗计划[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2004,13(2):113-116. 被引量:7
  • 2鲁明骞,黄慧强,徐光川,许新华,文采红,王杰,彭绪申.DHAP方案治疗复发难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的临床疗效观察[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(8):624-625. 被引量:13
  • 3邱红明,蔡俊杰,张素娟,董敬朋,陆药丹,陈源.鼻腔及咽淋巴环恶性淋巴瘤的免疫组化与基因重排检测[J].诊断病理学杂志,1996,3(3):129-131. 被引量:7
  • 4Lujan A E, Mundt A J, Yamada S D, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as a means of reducing dose to bone marrow in gynecologic patients receiving whole pelvic radiotherapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003, 57(2)516-521.
  • 5Wieland P, Dobler B, Mai S, et al. IMRT for postoperative treatment of gastric cancer: covering large target volumes in the upper abdomen., a comparwason of a step-and-shoot and an arc therapy approach[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004, 59 (4) : 1236- 1244.
  • 6Hong L, Alektiar K, Chui C, et al. IMRT of large fields: whole-abdomen irradiation[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002, 54(1) :278--289.
  • 7Firat S, Murray K, Erickson B. High-dose whole abdominal and pelvic irradiation for treatment of ovarian carcinoma: long-term toxicity and outcomes[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003, 57(1) :201-207.
  • 8Brihi E, Akoum R, Saade M, et al. Abdominal irradiation after chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma., review of 32 patients[J]. Mol Immunol, 2003, 39(17-18):1121-1128.
  • 9Lee S W, Russell A H, Kinney W K. Whole abdomen radiotherapy for patients with peritoneal dwassemination of endometrial adenocarcinoma[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003, 56 (3) :788-792.
  • 10Kocher M, Muller R P, Ross D, et al. Radiotherapy for treatment of localized gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma[J]. Radiother Oncol, 1997, 42(1) :37-41.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部