期刊文献+

给定上游独占垄断时下游厂商的创新激励研究 被引量:5

Innovation Incentives of the Duopolists in the Downstream Industry for Given Input Supplier Monopolist
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于上游厂商独占垄断以及下游厂商为同质S tacke lberg或Cournot双头垄断的假设,对上游厂商原料供应最优决策以及下游厂商的均衡利润与创新激励的决定过程进行了论证.结果表明:与上游完全竞争情形相比,上游厂商的独占垄断结构使得下游厂商的显著创新激励大幅下降,但非显著创新激励变化不明显. For a monopolistic input supplier and homogeneous Stackelberg or Cournot duopolistic firms in the downstream industry, a model is developed to examine how the optimal decision of the monopolist in the upstream industry, the equilibrium payoffs and the innovation incentives of the duopolists in the downstream industry are determined. It is found that the incentives of drastic innovation of duopolists facing a monopolistic input supplier decrease considerably, compared with those facing perfectly competitive input market, while the difference in incentives of non-drastic innovation is not obvious.
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期675-679,共5页 Control and Decision
关键词 创新激励 独占垄断 双头垄断 Innovation incentives, Monopoly Duopoly
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1J·泰勒尔.产业组织理论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:520-549.
  • 2Gilbert R,Newbery D.Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly[J].American Economic Review,1982,72(3):514-526.
  • 3Dasgupta P,Stiglitz J.Uncertainty,Industrial Structure,and the Speed of R&D[J].Bell J of Economics,1980,11(1):1-28.
  • 4Reinganum J.A Dynamic Game of R&D:Patent Protection and Competitive Behavior[J].Econometrica,1982,50(3):671-88.
  • 5Barro R J,Sala-i-Martin X.Economic Growth[M].MIT Press,1998.
  • 6Bester,Helmut,Petrakis,et al.The Incentives for Cost Reduction in a Differentiated Industry[J].Int J of Industrial Organization,1993,11(4):519-534.
  • 7Gallini N T.Deterrence Through Market Sharing:A Strategic Incentive for Licensing[J].American Economic Review,1984,74(5):931-941.
  • 8Jose J,Sempere Monerris,Vannetelbosch V.The Relevance of Bargaining for the Licensing of a Cost-reducing Innovation[J].Bulletin of Economic Research,2001,53(2):101-115.
  • 9郭红珍,黄文杰,张荣乾.上游市场结构与下游Cournot厂商创新者固定费用特许的互动研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005,22(10):125-134. 被引量:11

二级参考文献6

  • 1Arijit Mukherjee . 2003. Licensing in a vertically separated industry, Discussion Paper, 03/01,School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
  • 2Kabiraj, T. 2004. Technology Tranfer in a Stackelberg Structure : Licensing Contracts and Wdlfare, Draft.
  • 3Kamien, M. I. and Y. Tauman. 1984. The Private Value of a Patent : A Game Theoretic Analysis Journal of Economics[J]. 4, 93-118.
  • 4Kamien, M. I. and Y. Tauman. 1986. Fees versus Royalties and the Private Value of a Patent, The Quarterly Journal of Economics [J], 101, 471-491.
  • 5Wang, H. 1998. Fee Versus Royalty Licensing in a Cournot Duopoly Model, Economics Letters[J], 60, 55~62.
  • 6Wang, H. 2002. Fee versus Royalty Licensing in a Differentiated Cournot Duopoly, Journal of Economics and Business [J], 54, 253-266.

共引文献12

同被引文献58

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部