期刊文献+

数字加工和计算能力测验的修订及信效度检验 被引量:6

Revision of Test of Digital Processing and Calculation and Study on Its Reliability and Validity
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究对数字加工和计算能力测验进行了修订,修订工作主要包括三个部分:(1)测验的翻译;(2)预测验;(3)大样本测验。测验的分半信度为0.86,克伦巴赫α系数为0.93,被教师诊断为数字加工和计算障碍的学生几乎在所有的子测验成绩上都低于正常学生。这些结果表明,此测验是一个信度和效度均较高的测验。 This study revised the test named Neuropsychological Test Battery for Digital Processing and Calculation in children. There were three parts in the revision: (1) translation of test; (2)preliminary test; (3) large sample test. The split-half credibility of the test was 0.86; the test's coefficients of Cronbach' s owas 0. 93. There were significant differences between the pupils diagnosed as mathematical disorder and the normal pupils in the achievements of most subtests. These results indicated the test is of higher credibility and validity.
作者 张树东 董奇
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第5期62-66,共5页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
基金 国家攀登计划项目专项(95-专-09) 教育部科学技术重点项目"儿童数学障碍研究" 科技部国际合作重点项目"数学认知发展与脑机制研究"的资助
关键词 数字加工 修订 信度 效度 计算能力 测验 教育心理学 特殊教育 digital processing arithmetic revise reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献21

  • 1俞国良.学习不良儿童社会性发展特点的研究[J].心理科学,1997,20(1):31-35. 被引量:44
  • 2Geary D C. Mathematical Disabilities: Cognitive, Neuropsychological, and Genetic Components. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 114(2) : 345 - 362.
  • 3Montague M, Bos C. Cognitive and metacognitive characteristics of eighth - grade students'mathematical problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 1990, (2) : 109 - i27.
  • 4Presmeg N C. Prototypes, metapho.rs, metonymies, and imaginative rationality in high school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1992, 23:595-610.
  • 5Presmeg N C. Visualization in high school mathematics. For Learning of Mathematics, 1986, 63 : 42 - 46.
  • 6Presmeg N C. Visualization and mathematical giftedness. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1986, 17 : 297 - 311.
  • 7Lean C, Clements M A. Spatial ability, visual imagery, and mathematical performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1981,12: 267-299.
  • 8Hegarty M, Kozhevnikov M. Type of visual - spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999, 91(4) : 684-689.
  • 9Clarizio H F, Phillips S E. Defining severe discrepancy in the diagnosis of learning disabilities: a comparison of methods. Journal of School Psychology, 1989, 27 : 383 - 397.
  • 10Lohman D. Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge.In : R J Steinberg ed. Advances in the psychology of human intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988. 181 -248.

共引文献132

同被引文献126

引证文献6

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部