3Wilcock A, Pun M , Khanona J, et al Consumer attitudes, knowledge and behavior: a review of food safety issues[J]. Trends in Fcx3d Scienee Technology , 2004,15 :56 - 66.
4Nelson P. Information and Consumer Behavior[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1970,78 : 311 - 329.
5R M Blair, D A Nichols, D L Davis. Electronic animal identification for controlling feed delivery and detecting estrus in gilts and sows in outside pens [J]. J Anim Sci, 1994, (72):891-898.
6K O Silva, I A Naas. Using traceability for evaluating environmental quality in swine production [M]. In: Agribuilding Brazil: 2001, 9:448-451 Campinas, SP, Brazil.
7Davis J R, Dikeman M E. Practical aspects of beef carcass traceability in commercial beef processing plants using an electronic identification system [J]. J Animal Sci, 2002, (2):47-48.
8John K Augsburg. The benefits of animal identification for food safety [J]. Anim Sci, 1990, 68:880-883.
9Conill C, G Caja, R Nehring, et al. Effects of injection position and transponder size on the performances of passive injectable transponders used for the electronic identification of cattle [J]. J Anim Sci, 2000,(78):3001-3009.
10Conill C, G Caja, R Nehring, et al. The use of passive injectable transponders in fattening lambs from birth to slaughter:Effects of injecfon position, age and breed [J]. J Anim Sci,2002, 80:919-925.
