期刊文献+

论侵占罪中侵占行为的前提要件 被引量:1

Discussion on the Premise of the Misappropriating Behavior in the Crime of Embezzlement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 刑法理论界的通说一致认为,侵占罪中侵占行为成立的前提要件是合法持有。但这种观点人为地限定了侵占罪构成的范畴,有违刑法设立侵占罪之目的。事实上,在认定侵占行为的前提要件———持有时,只能对持有作事实上的理解,不能作性质上的判断,即不能够将行为人先前对财物的持有限定为合法持有,只能考虑持有事实本身对侵占罪认定的意义。所以,侵占罪中侵占行为成立的前提要件是持有而非合法持有。 An authoritative standpoint in the criminal circle is commonly known as that the premise of the misappropriating behavior in the crime of embezzlement is the legal possession. This point limits arbitrarily the scope of the constitution of the crime of embezzlement, which is opposite to the legislative aim of the criminal law concerning the crime of embezzlement . In fact, when we judge the premise of the constitution of the crime of embezzlement, we can only confirm the fact of misappropriating behavior, and can not judge the possessing property, namely, we can not limit the possessing property to the legal one, and only need consider the significance of the possessing fact to the crime. So the premise of the misappropriating behavior in the crime of embezzlement is not the legal possession but the fact of possession.
作者 谢晖
机构地区 襄樊学院政法系
出处 《襄樊学院学报》 2006年第3期31-34,共4页 Journal of Xiangfan University
关键词 侵占罪 侵占行为 持有 Crime of embezzlement Possessing behavior Possession
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1王作富.论侵占罪[J].法学前沿,1997,(1).
  • 2周少华.侵占埋藏物犯罪的若干问题探析[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),1998,20(3):75-81. 被引量:30
  • 3[4]西山府富夫.刑法通说各论[M].东京:八千代出版株式会社,1998.
  • 4[5]林山田.刑法各罪论[M].台北:三民书局,1995.
  • 5[7]大冢仁.刑法概说[M].东京:有斐阁,1996.
  • 6[10]大谷家.刑法讲义各论[M].东京:成文堂,2000.
  • 7黄祥青.侵占罪适用问题探析[J].人民司法,2001(1):45-48. 被引量:9
  • 8木村龟二主编.刑法学词典[M].上海:上海翻译出版公司.1991.
  • 9[14]陈兴良.刑事法判解-2[C].北京:法律出版社,2000.

共引文献44

同被引文献3

  • 1江平.民法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.758.
  • 2李秉勇.侵占罪若干问题研究.载http://www.i3721.com/lunwen/ffx/xfl/200606/149499_2.html.
  • 3孙向阳.论侵占罪[J].河北法学,2000,18(3):80-83. 被引量:7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部