期刊文献+

有剖宫产术史患者阴式子宫切除术临床分析 被引量:7

Clinical study of transvaginal hysterectomy in patients with previous history of cesarean section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨有剖宫产史的患者选择阴式子宫切除术的可行性及安全性。方法回顾性分析2000年1月至2005年1月行阴式子宫切除术中的196例病例,其中有剖宫产史的72例定为A组,无腹部手术史的70例为B组,除外剖宫产的腹部手术史54例为C组。分别就手术时间、术中出血量、子宫体积及住院日进行比较。结果A组手术时间(80±26)m in,B组(68±22)m in,C组(70±16)m in,A组明显长于B组或C组(P<0.05),B组与C组手术时间相似(P>0.05)。A组子宫体积(354.2±203.6)cm3,B组(469.2±269.3)cm3,C组(425.6±196.3)cm3,A组较B、C两组均小(P<0.05),B组与C组子宫体积相似。术中出血量及住院日3组间差异无统计学意义。A组2例膀胱损伤。结论有剖宫产史者的患者选择阴式子宫切除术是可行的。 Objective To assess the feasibility and safety of transvaginal hysterectomy (TVH) in patients with a previous history of cesarean section. Methods 196 women undergoing TVH were included in a retrospective study from January 2000 to January 2005. They were assigned to three groups, group A (72 cases,with a previous history of cesarean section), group B (70 cases, without a history of abdominal operation) and group C (54 cases ,with a history of abdominal operation except cesarean section). The operation time, uterine size, bleeding during operation and hospitalization duration were compared among the groups. Results The operation time of group A was ( 80 ± 26) minutes ,group B (68 ±22) minutes,group C (70 ± 16) minutes. The operation time of group A was significantly longer than that of group B or group C (P 〈 0.05) ,without a significant difference between group B and group C (P 〉 0.05). The uterine size was (354.2 ± 203.6) cm^3 in group A, (469.2 ± 269.3) cm^3 in group B, (425.6 ± 196.3 ) cm^3 in group C. The uterine size of group A was significantly smaller than that of group B and group C ( P 〈 0.05 ), without a significant difference between the two groups. There were no difference of the bleeding volum during operation and hospitalization duration among the groups. There were 2 cases of incidental in group A. Conclusion The patients who have a previous history of cesarean section can undergo transvaginal hysterectomy.
出处 《中国临床保健杂志》 CAS 2006年第3期238-239,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Healthcare
关键词 子宫切除术 阴道式 剖宫产术 对比研究 Hysterectomy, vaginal Cesarean section Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1Deval B, Rafii A, Soriano D, et al. Morbidity of vaginal hysterectomy for benign tumors as a function of uterine weight. J Reprod Med, 2003,48:435-440.
  • 2Paparella P, Sizzi O, Rossetti A, et al. Vaginal hysterectomy in generally considered contraindications to vaginal surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2004, 270:104-109.
  • 3Magos A, Bournas N, Sinha R, Vaginal hysterectomy for the large uterus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1996,103:246-251.
  • 4Cosson M, Querleu D, Subtil D, et al. The feasibility of vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1996,64:95-99.
  • 5Kovac SR. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol, 1995 ,85:18-23.
  • 6Boukerrou M, Lambaudie E, Collinet P, et al. Previous caesarean section is an operative risk factor in vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 2004,32:490-495.
  • 7Ballard LA, Walters MD. Transvaginal mobilization and removal of ovaries and fallopian tubes after vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol, 1996,87:35-39.
  • 8Mazdisnian F, Kurzel RB, Coe S, et al. Vaginal hysterectomy by uterine morcellation: an efficient, non-morbid procedure. Obstet Gynecol, 1995,86:60-64.
  • 9Unger JB. Vaginal hysterectomy for the woman with a moderately enlarged uterus weighing 200 to 700 grams. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999 ,180:1337-1344.
  • 10刘珠凤,郎景和,孙大为.阴式大子宫切除术25例临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,1999,34(8):456-458. 被引量:273

共引文献318

同被引文献36

引证文献7

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部