期刊文献+

PAR指数评价安氏Ⅱ类1分类错畸形单颌拔牙和双颌拔牙的矫治效果 被引量:3

Assessment of Upper Jaw Extraction versus Upper and Lower Jaw Extraction Treatment for ClassⅡ Division 1 Malocclusion Using Peer Assessment Rating Index
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用PAR指数评价上颌单颌拔牙和双颌拔牙矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错畸形的效果。方法选择52例安氏Ⅱ类1分类错患者,分为两组:单颌拔牙矫治组28例,双颌拔牙矫治组24例。采用PAR指数对两组患者矫治前后的牙齿排列、磨牙关系、覆盖、覆及中线情况进行评估和比较。结果双颌拔牙组患者的牙齿排列、PAR总分和加权总分在矫治前大于单颌拔牙组,矫治后与矫治前的差值亦大于单颌拔牙组(P<0.05),而两组患者矫治后PAR各项分值均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论双颌拔牙组患者的错较单颌拔牙组复杂,主要表现在牙齿拥挤方面;只要设计合理,适应证选择得当,两者均能获得良好的矫治效果。 Objective To assess the outcome of orthodontic treatment with upper jaw or upper and lower jaw extraction for Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion using the peer assessment rating(PAR) index. Methods 28 patients with Class Ⅱ division 1 were extracted two first premolars or second premolars of upper jaw, and 24 patients were extracted four premolars of upper and lower jaw N. The PAR was applied on pre-and pest-orthodontic treatment dental casts for the fifty-two cases. Results The upper and lower jaw extraction groups had significantly higher initial PAR scores and the weighted PAR total scores(P〈0.05). Although significantly different before treatment, beth groups were not statistically different after treatment (P〉0.05). Conclusion The upper and lower jaw extraction cases showed more severe dental displacement. Both treatment can acquire successful results.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期231-233,239,共4页 West China Journal of Stomatology
关键词 PAR指数 拔牙矫治 错[牙合]畸形 安氏Ⅱ类 peer assessment rating index orthodontic extraction malocclusion Anne's Class Ⅱ
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1McGorray SP,Wheeler TT,Keeling SD,et al.Evaluation of orthodontists' perception of treatment need and the peer assessment rating (PAR) index[J].Angle Orthod,1999,69(4):325-333.
  • 2DeGuzman L,Bahiraei D,Vig KW,et al.The validation of the peer assessment rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1995,107(2):172-176.
  • 3Richmond S,Shaw WC,O'Brien KD,et al.The development of the PAR index (peer assessment rating):Reliability and validity[J].Eur J Orthod,1992,14(2):125-139.
  • 4缪耀强,莫如昌,王传贵,刘从华.PAR指数在评估矫治结果中的临床应用[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,1998,14(4):16-18. 被引量:23
  • 5Richmond S,Shaw WC,Roberts CT,et al.The PAR index (peer assessment rating):Methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards[J].Eur J Orthod,1992,14(3):180-187.
  • 6Birkeland K,Furevik J,Boe OE,et al.Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR index[J].Eur J Orthod,1997,19 (3):279-288.
  • 7O'Brien KD,Robbins R,Vig KW,et al.The effectiveness of Class Ⅱ,division 1 treatment[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1995,107 (3):329-334.

共引文献22

同被引文献8

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部