期刊文献+

132例动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄临床分析 被引量:9

Clinical analysis of 132 patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄(ARAS)患者的临床特点,评价介入治疗和单纯药物治疗对肾功能预后的影响。方法分析本院经肾动脉造影确诊的ARAS患者132例的临床资料。88例单侧ARAS按年龄≤70岁和>70岁分组及按基础GFR≥60 ml/min和GFIR< 60 ml/min分组,比较介入治疗和药物治疗对GFR的影响。44例双侧ARAS按行双侧、单侧、非介入治疗分组,比较3组差异。结果单侧ARAS、年龄≤70岁者,介入治疗1年后GFR变化值优于药物治疗组(P<0.05);基础GFR≥60 ml/min者,介入治疗1年后GFR变化值优于药物治疗组(P<0.05);年龄>70岁,GFR<60 ml/min者,介入治疗与药物治疗相比,GFR变化值无显著性差异。双侧ARAS者双侧介入治疗GFR变化值优于单侧介入,单侧介入优于非介入治疗组。Logistic回归分析示基础GFR≥60 ml/min,进行介入治疗的单侧AKAS者,肾功能(GFR)的预后较好。结论单侧ARAS年龄≤70岁,介入治疗前GFR≥60 ml/min者,介入治疗后肾功能 (GFR)预后较好;年龄大于70岁的患者,介入前应仔细评估,慎重选择介入治疗。 Objective To evaluate the prognostic result of renal function on atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) patients after revascularization and medication therapy. Methods The clinical data of 132 ARAS patients diagnosed by renal angiography were analysed. For comparing the differences of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between revascularization and medication therapy, 88 patients with unilateral ARAS were divided into two groups: ≤ 70 and 〉70 years old, meanwhile, according to GFR, these patients were divided into ≥60 and 〈60 ml/min groups. Forty-four patients with bilateral ARAS were divided into bilateral, unilateral and non-revascularization three groups according to the treatment, and differences were compared among these three groups. Results In unilateral ARAS patients, the GFR variety after 1-year revascularization was better than that of medication therapy in ≤ 70 years old group and GFR ≥ 60 ml/min group. There were no differences of GFR variety between revascularization and medication in 〉 70 years old group and GFR 〈 60 ml/min group. In 44 bilateral ARAS patients, the GFR variety was better in bilateral revascularization group than that of other two groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that the revascularization and the GFR≥60 ml/min were positively correlated with the prognosis of renal function. Conclusions 1-year revascularization indicates a better prognosis of renal function for unilateral ARAS patients with age ≤ 70 years and GFR ≥ 60 ml/min. As for the ARAS patients older than 70 years old, revascularization must be estimated carefully in details.
出处 《中华肾脏病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期323-327,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nephrology
关键词 动脉硬化 肾动脉梗阻 药物疗法 预后 介入治疗 Arteriosclerosis Renal artery obstruction Drug therapy Prognosis Interventional therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Caps MT, Perissinotto C, Zierler RE, et al. Prospective study of atherosclerotic disease progression in the renal artery.Circulation, 1998, 98:2866-2872.
  • 2Van Ampting JM, Penne EL, Beek FJ, et al. Prevalence of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis in patients starting dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2003, 18: 1147-1151.
  • 3Martin LG, Rundback JH, Sacks D, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for angiography, angioplasty, and stent placement in the diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis in adults. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2002, 13: 1069-1083.
  • 4Sacks D, Marinelli DL, Martin LG, et al. Reporting standards for clinical evaluation of new peripheral arterial revascularization devices. Technology Assessment Committee. J Vase Interv Radiol,1997, 8(1 Pt 1):137-149.
  • 5Kaatee B, Beek FJ, Verschuyl EJ, et al. Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: ostial or truncal? Radiology, 1996, 199:637 -640.
  • 6Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron, 1976, 16:31-41.
  • 7National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification and stratification. Am J kidney Dis, 2002, 39(2 suppl 1):S1-S266.
  • 8Textor SC. Ischemic nephropathy: where axe we now? J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004, 15: 1974-1982.
  • 9Zalunardo N, Tuttle KR. Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis :current status and future directions. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens, 2004, 13:613-621.
  • 10Chabova V, Schirger A, Stanson AW, et al.Outcomes of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis managed without revascularization. Mayo Clin Proc, 2000, 75:437-444.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Safian RD, Textor SC. Renal artery stenosis. N Engl J Med, 2001,344:431-442.
  • 2Caps MT, Perissinotto C, Zierler RE, et al Prospective study of atherosclerotic disease progression in the renal artery. Circulation,1998, 98:2866-2872.
  • 3Hansen K J, Edwards MS, Craven TE, et al Prevalence of renovascular disease in the elderly: a population-based study. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 36:443-451.
  • 4White C J, Ramie SR, Collins TJ, et al Renal artery stent placement : utility in lesion difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty.J Am Col1 Cardiol, 1997, 30: 1445-1450.
  • 5Dorros G, Jaff M, Mathiak L, et aL Four-year follow-up of Palmaz-Schatz stent revascularization as treatment for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Circulation, 1998, 98 : 642-647.
  • 6Krumme B, Mann .IF. Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis in 2001 are we less confused than before? Nephrol Dial Transplant,2001, 16: 2124-2127.
  • 7Leertouwer TC, Gussenhoven E J, Bosch JL, et al. Stent placement for renal arterial stenosis: where do we stand? A meta-analysis.Radiology, 2000, 216 : 78-85.
  • 8Rundback JH, Sacks D, Kent KC, et al. Guidelines for the reporting of renal artery revascularization in clinical trials. American Heart Association. Circulation, 2002, 106 : 1572-1585.
  • 9Van de Ven PJ, Kaatee R, Beuder J J, et al. Arterial stenting and balloon angioplasty in ostial atherosclerotic renovascular disease: a randomized trial. Lancet, 1999, 353:282-286.
  • 10Watson PS, Hadjipetrou P, Cox SV, et al. Effect of renal artery stenting on renal function and size in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Circulation, 2000, 102 : 1671-1677.

共引文献19

同被引文献109

引证文献9

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部