期刊文献+

药物洗脱支架治疗老年女性多支冠脉病变的临床研究 被引量:3

Clinical investigation of drug-eluting stent in treatment of elderly female patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗老年女性多支冠状动脉病变的疗效及安全性。方法2002年10月~2005年6月经冠脉造影证实为多支冠状动脉病变老年(≥65岁)女性患者387例,均行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),其中DES组139例,普通金属支架(BMS)组248例。比较两组支架术后近期及远期的临床疗效。结果DES组糖尿病患者的比例明显高于BMS组(42.4%vs29.8%,P<0.05)。两组高血压病和心功能不全的比例、冠状动脉病变的严重程度、PCI成功率及并发症发生率均无统计学差异。对371例患者随访6~36个月(20.8±12.6个月),DES组和BMS组造影随访率分别为53.7%和56.1%,无明显差异(P>0.05),但DES组复查造影再狭窄率和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生率均明显低于BMS组(分别为4.2%vs15.8%和7.5%vs17.3%,P<0.05)。结论老年女性多支病变患者应用多枚DES的成功率高,严重并发症少,术后再狭窄率低,长期临床疗效良好。 Objective To retrospectively analyze the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) on prevention of restenosis in old female patients (≥65 years) with multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Methods 387 old female patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease underwent percutancous coronary intervention (PCI) were divided into the DES group (n= 139) and the metallic stent (BMS) group (n=248). Acute and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results The ratio of patients with diabetic disease was higher in DES group than that in BMS group (P〈0. 05). The ratios of hypertension, seriousness of coronary lesion, heart function, success rates of therapeutic measures were not significantly different between the two groups. Mean follow-up duration for 371 patients was 20. 8 _--±12. 6 months. Angiographic follow-up rate was similar in the two groups (53. 7%in DES group vs 56. 1% in BMS group, P〉0. 05). The rates of restenosis shown by angiogmphy and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were significantly lower in the DES group compared with BMS group (4.2% vs 15.8%, 7.5% vs 17.3%, P〈0.05). Condusion The implantation of DES inelderly female patients with multi-vessel disease can achieve high success rate, low rates of complications and restenosis and good long-term clinical outcome.
出处 《解放军医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期524-525,共2页 Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
基金 全军"十五"医药卫生科研基金课题资助项目(01Z001)
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 多支血管病变 支架 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 女性 老年人 coronary diseasc multivessel disease stents: angioplasty, tyansluminal, percutaneous coronary female aged
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献9

  • 1Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schluter M, et al. The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS). J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,43: 1110-1115.
  • 2Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: the TAX-US-IV trial. Circulation, 2004, 109:1942-1947.
  • 3Smith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines of percutaneous coronary interventions (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). J Am Coil Cardiol, 2001,37 : 2215-2239.
  • 4Arampatzis CA, Hoye A, Lemos PA, et al. Elective sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for multivessel disease involving significant LAD stenosis : one-year clinical outcomes of 99 consecutive patients-the Rotterdam experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2004,63:57-60.
  • 5Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Ennl J Med, 2003.349 : 1315-1323.
  • 6Tanabe K, Serruys PW, Grube E, et al. TAXUS Ⅲ Trial: in-stent restenosis treated with stent-based delivery of paclitaxel incorporated in a slow-release polymer formulation. Circulation, 2003,107:559-564.
  • 7Kong DF, Eisenstein EL, Sketch MH Jr, et al. Economic impact of drug-eluting stents on hospital systems: a disease-state model. Am Heart J, 2004,147 : 449-456.
  • 8Gulizia M, Martelli E, Tamburino C, et al. Potential impact of drug-eluting stents in Sicily: results from a multicenter survey and cost-benefit analysis of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents. Ital Heart J Suppl, 2004,5: 630-638.
  • 9韩雅玲,荆全民,王守力,王冬梅,苗志林,王祖禄,刘海伟,张晓星.直接冠状动脉支架置入术的前瞻性临床研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2002,30(5):265-268. 被引量:37

共引文献9

同被引文献17

  • 1Lei Gao,Xin Hu,Yu-Qi Liu,Qiao Xue,Yu Wang.Comparison of coronary DES and BMS in octogenarians: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Journal of Geriatric Cardiology,2013,10(4):336-343. 被引量:3
  • 2倪祝华,杨新春,王乐丰,葛永贵,邹阳春,王红石,夏昆,李惟铭,徐立.血管内超声显像在冠心病支架植入术中的应用[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2007,4(1):1-7. 被引量:10
  • 3Chen LY,Lennon RJ,Grantham JA,et al.In-hospital and long-term outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction[J].Am J Cardiol,2005,95 (3):349-354.
  • 4Myocardial Infarction Redifined-A Consensus Document of The joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction.The joint european society of cardiology/American college of cardiology Committee[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,36:959-969.
  • 5Zbigniew K.Radoslaw L Inportance of complete revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infartion treated with percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Am Heart,2007,153:304-312.
  • 6Duk-Woo Park MD,Sung-Cheol Yun PhD,Seung-Whan Lee MD,et al.Long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent Implantation versus coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease[J].Circulation,2008,117:2079-2086.
  • 7Michael E.Farkouh MD,George Dangas MD,PhD,Martin B.Leon MD,et al.Design of the future revascularization evaluation in patients with diabetes mellitus:optimal management of multivessel disease (FREEDOM) trial[J].Am Heart J,2008,155:215-223.
  • 8H.Vernon Andersom,Richard W.Smalling,Timothy D.Hennry drug-eluting stents for acute myocardial infarction[J].Journal of the American College of Cardiology,2007,49(19):1931-1933.
  • 9Rahul Bose,GAurav Gupta,Paul A.Grayburn safety of drug-eluting stents in the coronary artery in ST-elevation myocardial infarction at a single high-volume medical center[J].Am J Cardiol,2007,100:949-952.
  • 10Manesh R,et al.ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness criteria for coronary revascularization A report of the american college of cardiology foundation appropriateness criteria task force,society for cardiovascular angiography and Interventions,society of thoracic surgeons,american association for thoracic surgery,american heart association,and the american society of nuclear cardiology[J].Circulation,2009,119:1330-1352.

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部