摘要
目的 观察162例急性心肌梗死(AMI)病人治疗前后4周QTd、QTcd的演变。方法 162例AMI病人分成静脉溶栓再通组、静脉溶栓未通组及未溶栓组,在溶栓前及溶栓后2、12、24h、2~7d、14d、21d、28d同步记录12导联心电图,测量QTd、QTcd进行对照。结果 AMI静脉溶栓再通组与静脉溶栓未通组及未溶栓组QTd、QTcd有极显著性差异(P〈0.001),静脉溶栓未通组及未溶栓组QTd及QTcd无显著性差异(P〉0.05);3组间恶性室性心律失常的发生率分别为17.4%、56.3%和81.6%。结论 成功的静脉溶栓再灌注可使QTd、QTcd显著降低,并减少恶性室性心律失常的发生。
Objective Changes of 162 AMI patients QTd,QTed between pre- and post- treatment in 4weeks were observed. Methods 162 AMI patients were divided into intravenous thrombolysis recanaization, non- intravenous thrombolysis recanalization and non- intravenous thrombolysis groups. Comparing with QTd,QTed that were measured by ECG before thrombolysis and after thrombolysis 2 - hour,12 - hour,24 - hour,2 ~ 7 day,14 day,21 day,2.8 day. Results QTd,QTcd were significantly prolonged in patients with intravenous thrombolysis recanalization,non- intravenous thrombolysis recanalization and non- intravenous thrombolysis( P 〈 0.001). There was no significance different in QTd,QTcd between non - intravenous thrombolysis recanalization and non - intravenous thrombolysis( P 〉 0.05). The positive rate of three groups ventricular arrhythmia were 17.4% ,56.3% and 81 .6%. Conclusion Successful early repeffusion of AMI is associated with the reduction of QTd,QTed and the decreased risk of ventricular arrhythmia and risk eardial events.
出处
《黑龙江医学》
2006年第6期401-402,共2页
Heilongjiang Medical Journal