期刊文献+

双翅目昆虫(黑腹果蝇和冈比亚按蚊)内含子丢失的比较分析 被引量:2

Analysis of intron loss in Diptera (Drosophila melanogaster and Anopheles gambiae)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 内含子插入和丢失的进化动力及机制尚存在许多疑问。通过对真核生物的105个同源基因的蛋白质高度保守区域内含子-外显子结构的研究,对人Homosapiens、小鼠Musmusculus、大鼠Rattusnorvegicus、黑腹果蝇Drosophilamelanogaster、冈比亚按蚊Anophelesgambiae和秀丽隐杆线虫Caenorhabditiselegans的3574个内含子、1001个的内含子保守位点进行分析,推断出不同系统中内含子的变化途径。发现在进化早期,脊椎动物、双翅目昆虫和线虫的共同祖先中含有大量内含子,在进化过程中,双翅目昆虫和线虫发生了大量的内含子丢失,甚至在双翅目昆虫中内含子丢失较线虫更严重。线虫获得的内含子略多于丢失的内含子,而在双翅目昆虫中则显示出内含子的丢失明显多于内含子的获得。该结果合理地解释了内含子在脊椎动物、线虫及昆虫中数量的分布呈下降趋势。 The mechanisms and evolutionary dynamics of intron insert and loss in eukaryotic genes remain poorly understood. Here systematic methods were used to assess the causes of the present-day distribution of introns in different lineage in 105 protein-coding genes containing 3 574 introns and 1 001 intron conserved sites in distinct amino acid alignment sequences in orthologous genes from 6 genomes of vertebrates (Mus musculus , Rattus norvegicus and Homo sapiens ), Diptera (Drosophila melanogaster and Anopheles gambiae ) and nematode ( Caenorhabditis elegans ). It was inferred that the common ancestor of vertebrates, Diptera and nematodes hold numerous introns, which were lost in Diptera or nematodes. The loss was even more serious in Diptera than in nematodes. Furthermore, there were a fewer intron gain than loss in nematodes, but there were even more intron loss than gain in Diptera. The results felicitously explain that the number of introns distributed in vertebrates, Diptera and nematodes are declining sequentially.
出处 《昆虫学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期373-380,共8页 Acta Entomologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30470970)
关键词 双翅目昆虫 脊椎动物 线虫 进化 内含子丢失 蛋白质高度保守区域 Diptera vertebrates nematodes evolution intron loss high conserved protein domain
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Adams MD,Celniker SE,Holt RA,Gocayne JD,Amanatides PG,Scherer SE,Li PW,Hoskin RA,Galle RF,2000.The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.Science,287:2 185-2 195.
  • 2Babenko VN,Rogozin IB,Mekhedov SL,Koonin EV,2004.Prevalence of intron gain over intron loss in the evolution of paralogous gene families.Nucleic Acids Research,32(12):3 724-3 733.
  • 3Brown JR,Doolittle WF,1997.Archaea and the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition.Microbiol.Rev.,61:456-502.
  • 4Budin K,Philippe H,1998.New insights into the phylogeny of eukaryotes based on ciliate Hsp70 sequences.Mol.Biol.Evol.,15:943-956.
  • 5Charlesworth D,Liu FL,Zhang L,1998.The evolution of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene family by loss of introns in plants of the genus Leavenworthia (Brassicaceae).Mol.Biol.Evol.,5(5):552-559.
  • 6Cho S,Jin SW,Cohen A,Ellis RE,2004.A phylogeny of Caenorhabditis reveals frequent loss of introns during nematode evolution.Genome Research,14:1 207-1 220.
  • 7Fedorov A,Merican AF,Gilbert W,2002.Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal,plant,and fungal genes.PNAS,99:16 128-16 133.
  • 8Fedorov A,Roy S,Fedorova L,Gilbert W,2003.Mystery of intron gain.Genome Research,13:2 236-2 241.
  • 9Fitch WM,1970.Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins.Syst.Zool.,19:99-106.
  • 10Fitch WM,2000.Homology:a personal view on some of the problems.Trends in Genetics,16:227-231.

同被引文献38

  • 1杨帆,刘卫平.核糖体蛋白基因及其与人类疾病的研究进展[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2005,21(3):354-356. 被引量:5
  • 2Adams MD, Celniker SE, Hoh RA et al., 2000. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science, 287:2 185-2 195.
  • 3Babenko VN, Rogozin IB, Mekhedov SL, Koonin EV, 2004. Prevalence of intron gain over intron loss in the evolution of paralogous gene families. Nucleic Acids Research, 32(12) : 3 724 -3 733.
  • 4Boeke JD, Garfinkel DJ, Styles CA, Fink GR, 1985. Ty elements transpose through an RNA intermediate. Cell, 40(3) : 491 -500.
  • 5Brown JR, Doolittle WF, 1997. Archaea and the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 61:456 - 502.
  • 6Charlesworth D, Liu FL, Zhang L, 1998. The evolution of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene family by loss of introns in plants of the genus Leavenworthia (Brassieaceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15 (5) : 552 -559.
  • 7Dacks JB, Doolittle WF, 2001. Reconstructingc/deconstructing the earliest eukaryotes: How comparative genomics can help. Cell, 107 (4) : 419 -425.
  • 8Fedorov A, Merican AF, Gilbert W, 2002. Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 99 ( 25 ) : 16 128 - 16 133.
  • 9Fedorov A, Roy S, Fedorova L, Gilbert W, 2003. Mystery of intron gain. Genome Research, 13:2 236 -2 241.
  • 10Fink GR, 1987. Pseudogenes in yeast? Cell, 49( 1 ) : 5 -6.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部