期刊文献+

黄斑蜂族的系统学研究:几何形态测量方法 (膜翅目:切叶蜂科) 被引量:8

Systematical studies on Anthidiini (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae):A geometric morphometric approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用采集于土耳其安纳托利亚中部(Middle Anatolia)的切叶蜂科6个种92头标本,选取虫体上的30个特征点(1andmarks)(其中前翅16个,后翅6个,头部8个),利用UPGMA等数值分类方法对不同属和种的亲缘关系进行了探讨.据此对一些种的归属和一些属的划分提出了一些与传统分类观点相同或不同的见解,但各种分析方法的结果都支持切叶蜂族Megachilini起源的单系性. The classificatory schema in some groups of Megachilidae reorganized by means of shape differences in terms of the inter- and intra-specific and inter- and intra-generic and subgeneric deformations. The relative warps,UPGMA trees and PCA graphs obtained from 30 landmarks were shown. Both Anthidium cingulatum Latreille and A.florentinum (Fabricius) should better classify in the same subgenus Anthidium s. str. In the other case under the results of shape variation our results supported the hypothesis that Paraanthidium as a subgenus of Anthidium Fabricius. On the other hand Icteranthidium Michener and Paraanthidiellum Michener showed enough dissimilarity to be kept as separate genera. Our analysis also supported the monophyletic origin of Megachilini which was clustered as a separate group by all methods used.
出处 《昆虫学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期474-483,共10页 Acta Entomologica Sinica
基金 The authors would thank to A. Rasim BARUTCU, Handan SEVIM (Hacettepe University, Department of Biology, TURKEY) for their great helps and to Dr. Paul 0'HIGGINS and Dr. N. J0NES (The Hull York Medical School, ENGLAND) for sharing their excellent software M0RPH0L0GIKA with us.
关键词 切叶蜂科 黄斑蜂族 系统分类学 几何形态测量 UPGMA Megachilidae Anthidiini systematics geometric morphometrics UPGMA generalized .procrustes analysis relative warps
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Alibert P,Moureau B,Dommergues JL,DavidB,2001.Differentiation at a microgeographical scale within two species of groundbeetle,Carabus auronitens and C.nemoralis (Coleoptera,Carabidae):a geometricalmorphometric approach.Zoologica Scripta,30(4):299-316.
  • 2Arnqvist G,Martensson T,1998.Measurement error in geometric morphometrics:empricalstrategies to assess and reduce its impact on measures of shape.Acta Zoologica AcademiaScientiarum Hungaricae,44:73-96.
  • 3Aytekin AM,Cagatay N,Hazir S,2002.Parasites,micro-organisms and floral choices innatural populations of bumblebees (Apidae:Hymenoptera) in Ankara province.Turkish Journalof Zoology.26.149-155.
  • 4Aytekin AM,Rasmont P,Cagatay N,2003.Molecular and morphometric variation in Bombusterrestris lucoformis Krüger and Bombus terrestris dalmatinus Dalla Torre(Hymenoptera:Apidae).Mellifera,3 (6):34-40.
  • 5Banaszak J,Romasenko L,1998.Megachilid Bees of Europe.Pedagogical University ofBydgoszcz.239.
  • 6Bookstein FL,1991.Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data.Geometry and Biology.CambridgeUniversity Press.435.
  • 7Davis PH,1968-1985.Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands.Volume 1-9.University ofEdinburgh Press,Edinburgh.
  • 8Dryden IL,Mardia KV,1998.Statistical Shape Analysis.London:John Wiley and Sons.
  • 9Engel MS,1999.Megachile glaesaria the first Megachilid bee fossil from amber(Hymenoptera:Megachilidae).American Museum Novitates.No:3 276.13pp.
  • 10Gogola A,1991.Contribution to the Knowledge of the Bee Fauna of Slovenia(Hymenoptera:Apidae).Scopolia,25:1-33.

同被引文献100

引证文献8

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部