期刊文献+

面向对象范型体系结构中构件行为相容性研究 被引量:18

Study on Behavioral Compatibility of Components in Software Architecture Using Object-Oriented Paradigm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 软件体系结构(SA)为基于构件的软件开发提供了一种高层次的抽象.如何有效描述体系结构中构件的对外交互行为、验证组装构件间的行为相容及保证整个体系结构行为无死锁是其中较为重要的研究内容.在基于面向对象范型这类重要的软件体系结构中,构件组装通常是通过接口方法调用加以实现.针对这样一类基于软件体系结构的构件组装问题,形式描述与定义了构件及其对外交互协议,分析了服务请求构件与服务提供构件所能展示的不同行为,给出了组装交互的构件在请求/提供接口上协议级行为相容的一组验证规则及相关定理.最后,通过一个电子商务应用实例来说明所提出途径的可用性和针对性. Software architecture (SA) provides a high-level abstraction for component-based software development. It's important to specify the interaction behavior of the components, verify the compatibility among the components, and ensure the deadlock-freedom of the composition configuration at the architectural level. Many component-based software architectures are using object-oriented paradigm, in which component composition is implemented by method invocations over component interfaces. Concentrating on the component composition in this kind of SA, this paper formally specifies the components and their interaction behaviors, distinguishes the caller's behavior from the callee's in interaction, and then presents a set of rules to verify the behavioral compatibility on the interfaces between the components composed together. Finally, an example of e-commerce application is presented to illustrate the feasibility and pertinence of the approach.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期1276-1286,共11页 Journal of Software
基金 国家自然科学基 国家高技术研究发展计划(863) 国家重点基础研究发展规划(973))~~
关键词 构件 构件组装 软件体系结构 行为相容 无死锁 component component composition software architecture behavioral compatibility deadlock-free
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献75

  • 1马晓星,余萍,陶先平,吕建.一种面向服务的动态协同架构及其支撑平台[J].计算机学报,2005,28(4):467-477. 被引量:80
  • 2[1]Garlan, D., Shaw, M., An introduction to software architecture, in Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 2, Singapore: World Scientific, 1993, 1—39.
  • 3[2]Perry, D. E., Wolf, A. L., Foundations for the study of software architecture, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 1992, 17(4): 40—52.
  • 4[3]Allen, R., Garlan, D., Formalizing architectural connection, in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 16), Italy, Los Angeles: IEEE Computer Society Press, May, 1994, 71—80.
  • 5[4]Allen, R., Garlan, D., A formal basis for architectural connection, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, July, 1997, 6(3): 213—249.
  • 6[5]Shaw, M., Deline, R., Klein, D.V. et al., Abstractions for software architecture and tools to support them, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1995, 21(4): 314—335.
  • 7[6]Luckham, D.C., Vera, J., An event-based architecture definition language, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1995, 21(9): 717—734.
  • 8[7]Garlan, D., Monroe, R. Wile, D., ACME: An architecture description interchange language, in Proceedings of the IBM Centre for Advanced Studies Conference (CASCON'97), Toronto, November 1997, 169—183.
  • 9[8]Dashofy, E. M., Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R. N., Using off-the-shelf middleware to implement connectors in distributed software architectures, in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 21), Los Angeles: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1999, 3—12.
  • 10[9]Moriconi, M., Qian, X., Riemenschneider, R. A., Correct architecture refinement, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, April 1995, 21(4): 356—372.

共引文献281

同被引文献123

引证文献18

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部