批评的错位——关于赵树理的身份问题

Zhao Shuli's identity in literary criticism

对身份定位的漠视往往造成批评与言说对象的错位,这在一定程度上影响了赵树理研究的进一步深入。该文通过考察赵树理对文学的最初选择、创作实践中的价值取向及其最终对小说形式的放弃这三个阶段,得出结论:从主体的角度来说,赵树理对"作家"这一身份缺乏自我认同感;但从文学创作的客观事实来看,赵树理的创作为中国文学的当代发展提供了独特的文本。这是评价赵树理文学作品的一个基点。

Ignoring the verification of identity usually results in mismatch between criticism and the related objective, which to some extent, hampers further research into Zhao＇s literary creation. By studying his initial motive to literature, his value orientation in practice and his eventual abandonment of fictional style, the thesis concludes that, in the meaning of self- recognition, Zhao is not really an author. However, from the reality, Zhao Shuli＇s literary creation provides a particular style for contemporary Chinese literature. All of the evaluation on Zhao Shuli＇s works should base on this point.