期刊文献+

3种肺炎克雷伯菌生物膜制备方法的比较 被引量:5

Comparison of three methods for preparing the biofilm produced by Klebsiella pneumoniae
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较3种体外制备肺炎克雷伯菌生物膜的方法。方法用高分子滤膜琼脂培养法、高分子滤膜肉汤培养法和输液管肉汤培养法制备肺炎克雷伯菌生物膜,通过菌落计数判断3种方法的效果。结果培养5和10d后,3种方法的菌落计数分别是:(1.32±0.26)×109CFU/mL,(0.22±0.026)×109CFU/mL,(0.15±0.025)×109CFU/mL和(3.68±0.51)×109CFU/mL,(0.24±0.022)×109CFU/mL,(0.20±0.035)×109CFU/mL。高分子滤膜琼脂培养法明显优于其他2种方法(P<0.01)。结论用高分子滤膜琼脂培养法制备肺炎克雷伯菌生物膜操作简便,效果最佳。 Objective To compare three methods for preparing the biofilm of Klebsiella pneurnoniae in vitro. Methods K. pneurnoniae biofilm was prepared through high molecular membrane agar method, high molecular membrane broth method and infusion tube broth method. The number of colonies in biofilm was counted to judge the utility of each method. Results The colony count of above three methods were (1.32 ± 0.26) ×10^9CFU/mL, (0.22 ± 0. 026) ×10^9CFU/mL and (0.15 ± 0. 025) ×10^9 CFU/mL respectively after 5 days incubation and (3.68 ± 0.51 ) ×10^9CFU/mL, (0. 24 ± 0. 022) ×10^9 CFU/mL and (0.20 ± 0. 035) ×10^9CFU/mL after 10 days. High molecular membrane agar method was much better than the other two methods (P 〈0.01 ). Conclusions High molecular membrane agar method is a convenient and effective method to prepare K. pneurnoniae biofilm.
出处 《中国感染与化疗杂志》 CAS 2006年第3期193-195,共3页 Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
关键词 肺炎克雷伯菌 生物膜 制备方法 Klebsiella pneumoniae Biofilm Preparation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Sutherland IW. The biofilm matrix-an immobilized but dynamic microbial environment[J]. Trends Microbiol, 2001, 9:222-227.
  • 2Gilbert P, Allison DG, McBain AJ. Biofilms in vitro and in vivo: do singular mechanisms imply cross-resistance? [J] Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol, 2002, 2:98S-110S.
  • 3Costerton JW, Stewart PS. Battling biofilms[J]. Sci Am, 2001,285:74-81
  • 4Rasmussen TB, Skindersoe ME, Bjarnsholt T,et al. Identity and effects of quorum-sensing inhibitors produced by Penicillium species[J]. Microbiology, 2005, 151 : 1325-1340.
  • 5Patel R. Biofilms and antimicrobial resistance[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005,437 : 41-47.

同被引文献34

  • 1苗丽霞,张宝琴,肖谧,张镇西.光动力作用与生物膜[J].中国激光医学杂志,2005,14(3):190-193. 被引量:6
  • 2周斯博,张智红,Onega V Ulianova,Sergey S Ulyanov,骆清铭.光动力作用对铜绿假单胞杆菌杀伤效应的研究[J].激光生物学报,2006,15(5):453-457. 被引量:6
  • 3Brown SB, Brown EA, Walker I. The present and future role of photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment. Lancet Ortcol, 2004, 5 : 497- 508.
  • 4Jori G, Fabris C, Soncin M, et al. Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of microbial infections :basic principles and perspective applications. Laser Surg Med, 2006, 38 : 468-481.
  • 5Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Effect of cell-photosensitizer binding and cell density on microbial photoinactivation. Antimierob Agents Chemother, 2005, 49: 2329-2335.
  • 6Soukos NS, Mulholland SE, Socransky SS, et al. Photodestruction of human dental plaque bacteria: enhancement of the photodynamic effect by pbotomechanical waves in an oral biofilm model. Laser Surg Med, 2003, 33: 161-168.
  • 7Soukos NS, Wilson M, Burns T, et al. Photodynamic effects of toluidine blue on human oral keratlnocytes and fibroblasts and Streptoco- ccus sanguis evaluated in vitro. Laser Surg Med, 1996, 18:253-259.
  • 8Usachaeva MN, Teicheert MC, Biel MA, et al. Comparison of the methylene blue and toludine blue photobactericidal efficacy against gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms. Laser Surg Med, 2001, 29: 165-173.
  • 9Zeina B, Greenman J, Purcell WM, et al. Killing of cutaneous microbial species by photodynamic therapy. Br J Dermatol, 2001, 144: 274-278.
  • 10Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilm: a common cause of persistent infections. Science, 1999, 284 : 1318-1322.

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部