期刊文献+

艾虎对猎物和捕食者气味的反应 被引量:4

Response of the Steppe Polecat (Mustela eversmanni) to the Odors of Prey and Predator
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在室内条件下通过双通道选择实验确定艾虎(Mustelaeversmanni)在通过不同气味源的场所中的取食量以及利用时间和利用频次,由此分析捕食者气味和猎物气味对艾虎取食行为的影响。研究结果表明,在无任何气味源存在时,艾虎在对照气味和对照气味组这两个场所中的取食量、活动时间和活动频次基本一致。在猎物高原鼠兔(Ochotonacurzoniae)气味和对照气味组及高原鼢鼠(Myospalaxbaileyi)气味和对照气味组的两组实验中,艾虎在通过猎物气味的场所中的取食量、活动时间和活动频次与对照气味场所中比较也无明显的差异,但是在天敌动物赤狐(Vulpesvulpes)气味存在的条件下,艾虎明显减少在通过赤狐气味的场所中的取食量、活动时间和活动频次。同时,当间接捕食风险天敌动物赤狐气味存在时,艾虎明显增加了总的取食量,减少了在巢箱中居住的时间,而将更多的时间停留在无风险的场所中,这说明艾虎能够利用天敌动物赤狐的气味,采用增加取食量和减少高风险区域活动时间的策略来降低被捕食风险。 The food intake, duration of stay and frequency of visitation of the steppe polecat (Mustela eversmanni ) staying in places with different species' odors were investigated through the two-choice test in the laboratory, and the effects of different species' odors on the feeding behaviors of the polecats were determined. The results showed that the food intake, duration of stay and frequency of visitation of the polecat were the same when there were no odors in either of the two patches. The odors of two prey species, the zokor ( Myospalax baileyi ) and the pika ( Ochotona cu, rzoniae ) had no significant influence on the polecat behaviour compared with the controls. The variables were all much higher in the control site than in the site of the red fox's odor, The polecat significantly increased total food intake, decreased the living time in nest boxes and spent more time in the control place when the odor of the red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) existed in the other patch, as indirect predation risk existed. The polecat had the ability to decrease the predation risk through the strategy of increasing the food intake and decreasing the time of staying in the high predation risk patch.
出处 《Zoological Research》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期269-274,共6页 动物学研究(英文)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(39770106 30570289)~~
关键词 艾虎 气味 捕食者 猎物 Mustela eversmanni Odor Predator Prey
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Bramley GN,Waas JR.2001.Laboratory and field evaluation of predator odors as repellents for kiore (Rattus exulans) and ship rats (R.rattus)[J].J Chem Ecol,27(5):1029-1047.
  • 2Bramley GN,Waas JR,Henderson HV.2000.Responses of wild norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) to predator odors[J].J Chem Ecol,26(3):705-719.
  • 3Brodie ED,Formanovicz DR Jr,Brodie ED.1991.Predator avoidance and antipredator mechanisms:Distinct pathways to survival[J].Ethol Ecol Evol,3:73-77.
  • 4Cupp PVJR.1994.Salamanders avoid chemical cues from predator[J].Anim Behav,48:232-235.
  • 5Epple G,Mason JR,Nolte Dl,Campbell DL.1993.Effects of predator odors on feeding in the mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa)[J].J Mammal,74:715-722.
  • 6Hilario D,David T,Chiszar.2000.Habitat selection and prey odor in the foraging behavior of western rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis)[J].Behaviour,137(1):119-135.
  • 7Huey RB,Pianka ER.1981.Ecological consequences of foraging mode[J].Ecology,62:991-999.
  • 8Jedrzejewski W,Jedrzejewska B.1993.Responses of bank voles to the odours of seven species of predators:Experimental data and their relevance to natural predator-vole relationships[J].Oikos,68:251-257.
  • 9Jones M,Dayan T.2000.Foraging behavior and microhabitat use by spiny mice,Acomys cahirinus and A.russatus,in the presence of blanfords fox (Vulpes cana) odor[J].J Chem Ecol,26(2):455-469.
  • 10Keefe M.1992.Chemically mediated avoidance behaviour in wild brook trout,Salvelinus fontinalis:The response to familiar and unfamiliar predaceous fishes and the influence of fish diet[J].Can J Zool,70:288-292.

共引文献13

同被引文献50

  • 1周文扬,魏万红.赤狐的活动节律与产仔洞穴的选择[J].兽类学报,1995,15(4):267-272. 被引量:21
  • 2杨生妹,魏万红,殷宝法,樊乃昌,周文扬.艾虎对不同猎物的选择性[J].动物学报,2006,52(3):437-443. 被引量:3
  • 3周文扬 魏万红.艾虎种群动态及其影响因素的研究[J].高原生物学集刊,1994,12:161-171.
  • 4边疆晖,樊乃昌.捕食风险与动物行为及其决策的关系[J].生态学杂志,1997,16(1):34-39. 被引量:16
  • 5Bachman GC. 1993. The effect of body condition on the trade-off between vigilance and foraging in Belding's ground squirrels[J]. Anita Behav, 46 (2): 233-244.
  • 6Banschbach VS. Waddington KD. 1994. Risk-sensitive foraging in honey bees: No consensus among individuals and no effect of colony honey stores[J].Anim Behav, 47 (4): 933-941.
  • 7Barkan CP. 1990. A field test of risk-sensitive foraging in black-capped chickadees ( Parus atricopillus ) [J]. Ecology, 71 (1): 391-400.
  • 8Barnard CJ, Brown CAJ. 1987. Risk-sensitive foraging and patch residence time in common shrews, Sorex araneus L[J]. Anita behav, 35 (4): 1255-1257.
  • 9Bateson M, Kacelnik A. 1995. Preferences for fixed and variable food sources: Variability in amount and delay[J]. J Exp Anal Behav, 63 (3): 313-329.
  • 10Battalio RC, Kagel JH, Macdonald DN. 1985. Animals'choices over certain out comes: some initial experimental results[J]. Am Ecol Rev, 75: 597-613.

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部