期刊文献+

基于生态足迹的可持续评价指标体系的构建 被引量:92

Design of Sustainability Indicators System Based on Ecological Footprint
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的鉴于生态足迹法存在的缺陷,增加新的指标以改进该方法在评价区域可持续发展中的不足,构建可持续发展定量评价的新指标体系,完善可持续发展评价法。方法在生态足迹法的基础上,提出了生态压力指数、生态占用指数、生态经济协调指数和可持续发展指数4个概念,且制定了相应的指标等级划分标准,形成新的指标体系。结果利用该评价指标体系对全球147个国家及中国部分省、市和县作了评价。结论该评价指标体系可运用于不同时空条件下的可持续评价。 [Objective] Considering the deficiency of ecological footprint method, it is significant to ameliorate the region sustainable quantitative assessment by making a new indicators system. [Method] Based on the principle of ecological footprint, this paper put forward four concepts, which are ecological tension index, ecological occupancy index, ecological economic coordination index and sustainable development index, as indicators of sustainability assessment system. Accordingly, the standard of footprint indexes rank is constituted. [ Result] The indicators system and rank partition standard are used to evaluate the 147 countries in the world and some provinces, cities and counties in China. [ Conclusion] The new indicators system and standard can be well used for the sustainable quantitative assessment at various temporal and spatial levels.
出处 《中国农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期1202-1207,共6页 Scientia Agricultura Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(3937055 39670586) 陕西省自然科学基金项目(2001SM27) 陕西省软科学项目(2003KR02)
关键词 生态足迹 生态压力指数 生态占用指数 生态经济协调指数 可持续评价 Ecological footprint Ecological tension index Ecological occupancy index Ecological economic coordination index Sustainability assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1邱化蛟,常欣,程序,朱万斌.农业可持续性评价指标体系的现状分析与构建[J].中国农业科学,2005,38(4):736-745. 被引量:39
  • 2李利锋,郑度.区域可持续发展评价:进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2002,21(3):237-248. 被引量:84
  • 3华红莲,潘玉君.可持续发展评价方法评述[J].云南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,25(3):65-70. 被引量:12
  • 4Wackernagel M,Rees W E.Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital:Economics from an ecological footprint perspective.Ecological Economics,1997,20:3-24.
  • 5Wackernagel M,Onisto L,Bello P.National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept.Ecological Economics,1999,29:375-390.
  • 6Haberl H,Erb K H,Krausmann F.How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time:The case of Austria 1926-1995.Ecological Economics,2001,38:25-45.
  • 7Wackernagel M,Monfreda C,Erb K H,Haberl H,Schulz N B.Ecological footprint time series of Austria,the Philippines,and South Korea for 1961-1999:Comparing the conventional approach to an′actual land area' approach.Land Use Policy,2004,21:261-269.
  • 8Wackernagel M,Monfreda C,Schulz N B,Erb K H,Haberl H,Krausmann F.Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series:Resolving conceptual challenges.Land Use Policy,2004,21:271-278.
  • 9徐中民,陈东景,张志强,程国栋.中国1999年的生态足迹分析[J].土壤学报,2002,39(3):441-445. 被引量:367
  • 10徐中民,张志强,程国栋.甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析[J].地理学报,2000,55(5):607-616. 被引量:826

二级参考文献188

共引文献1908

同被引文献1098

引证文献92

二级引证文献415

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部