摘要
关于盗窃罪既未遂标准,理论界存在接触说、藏匿说、控制说、转移说、失控说和取得说等学说,然而这些学说均存在一定的缺陷和不足。盗窃罪作为一种以非法占有为目的的故意犯罪,根据主客观相统一的刑法基本原则,应当以非法占有目的的实现与否作为盗窃罪既遂未遂的区分标准,即当行为人明知是他人数额较大或巨大的财物而加以盗窃,并且在行为展开后其非法占有目的得到完全实现时,构成盗窃罪的既遂;当行为人明知是他人数额较大或巨大的财物而加以盗窃,因意志以外的原因未能实现或未能全面实现其非法占有目的时,构成盗窃罪的未遂。
There're different results of theft crimes in the same state, just because the variety of the standards of the accomplishment theoties about the theft crime. Although the controversy of the theorists is accepted, it is urgent to make a scientific standard to end the chaotic complexion in practice. This is needed from the view of maintaining the equality and dignity of the law. With the analysis controversy of the present theorists, this article expounds a new standaxd which is suitable to solve the problem of the accomplishment of the theft crime.
出处
《南都学坛(南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报)》
2006年第3期85-88,共4页
Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University