期刊文献+

Resolution of phylogenetic relationships of the major subfamilies of the Delphacidae (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea) using the mitochondrial ribosomal DNA 被引量:3

Resolution of phylogenetic relationships of the major subfamilies of the Delphacidae (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea) using the mitochondrial ribosomal DNA
原文传递
导出
摘要 Delphacid relationships from the genus level to the subfamily have been completely resolved (among those taxa examined) using sequence data from the 3' end of the 12S gene. Monophyly of the non-asiracine subfamilies was strongly supported and the asiracine Ugyops was placed in the most basal position of the tree. Support levels for monophyly of the Delphacini increased after weighting transversions more heavily than transitions and after removing the cixiid outgroup from the dataset. Among the Delphacini, Conomelus and Megamelus were more closely related to each other than either was to Chloriona. These results are in agreement with the tree based on morphological characters. However, in contrast to morphological data our results strongly supported a sister group relationship between the Stenocraninae and the Kelisiinae. Although the 12S gene fragment gave some information about the species relationships within Chloriona, neither this fragment nor the 5' end of the 16S gene appear to be very useful for this level. Molecular evolutionary patterns provided evidence that there has been a shift in base composition from T to A during the early evolution of the non-Asiracinae. The non-Asiracinae also had comparatively fast substitution rates and these two observations are possibly correlated. In the ‘ modem' delphacid Chloriona, the AT content was comparatively low in regions free of constraints but this was not the case for ‘ non-modem' delphacids. The tRNA for valine has been translocated elsewhere, probably before the Delphacidae and Cixiidae diverged from each other. Delphacid relationships from the genus level to the subfamily have been completely resolved (among those taxa examined) using sequence data from the 3' end of the 12S gene. Monophyly of the non-asiracine subfamilies was strongly supported and the asiracine Ugyops was placed in the most basal position of the tree. Support levels for monophyly of the Delphacini increased after weighting transversions more heavily than transitions and after removing the cixiid outgroup from the dataset. Among the Delphacini, Conomelus and Megamelus were more closely related to each other than either was to Chloriona. These results are in agreement with the tree based on morphological characters. However, in contrast to morphological data our results strongly supported a sister group relationship between the Stenocraninae and the Kelisiinae. Although the 12S gene fragment gave some information about the species relationships within Chloriona, neither this fragment nor the 5' end of the 16S gene appear to be very useful for this level. Molecular evolutionary patterns provided evidence that there has been a shift in base composition from T to A during the early evolution of the non-Asiracinae. The non-Asiracinae also had comparatively fast substitution rates and these two observations are possibly correlated. In the ‘ modem' delphacid Chloriona, the AT content was comparatively low in regions free of constraints but this was not the case for ‘ non-modem' delphacids. The tRNA for valine has been translocated elsewhere, probably before the Delphacidae and Cixiidae diverged from each other.
出处 《Insect Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2006年第3期167-177,共11页 昆虫科学(英文版)
关键词 classification DELPHACIDAE evolution FULGOROIDEA HOMOPTERA rnitochondrial DNA PHYLOGENY ribosomal DNA classification, Delphacidae, evolution, Fulgoroidea, Homoptera, rnitochondrial DNA, phylogeny, ribosomal DNA
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Artiss, T, Schultz, T.R, Polhemus D.A. and Simon, C. (2001) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the dragonfly genera Libellula, Ladona, and Plathemis (Odonata: Libellulidae) based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I and 16S rRNA sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 18, 348-361.
  • 2Asche, M. (1985) Zur Phylogenie der Delphacidae Leach, 1815 (Homoptera Cicadina Fulgoromorpha). Marburger Entomologische Publikationen, 2, 1-912.
  • 3Asche, M. (1988) Preliminary thoughts in the phylogeny of the Fulgoromorpha (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Proceedings of the 6th International Auchenorrhyncha Meeting (eds. C. Vidano & A. Arzone), pp. 47-53. University of Turin, Turin.
  • 4Asche, M. (1990) Vizcayinae, a new subfamily of Delphacidae with revision of Vizcaya Muir (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea): A significant phylogenetic link. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers, 30, 154-187.
  • 5Boore, J.L. (1999) Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 27, 1767-1780.
  • 6Bourgoin, T, Steffen-Campbell, J.D. and Campbell, B.C. (1997) Molecular phylogeny of Fulgoromorpha (Insecta, Hemiptera, Archaerrhyncha). The enigmatic Tettigometridae: Evolutionary affiliations and historical biogeography. Cladistics, 13, 207-224.
  • 7Broughton, R.E, Stanley, S.E. and Durrett, R.T. (2000) Quantification of homoplasy for nucleotide transitions and transversions and a reexamination of assumptions in weighted phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology, 49, 617-627.
  • 8Campbell, B.C, Steffen-Campbell, J.D, Sorensen, J.T. and Gill, R.J. (1995) Paraphyly of Homoptera and Auchenorrhyncha inferred from 18S rDNA nucleotide sequences. Systematic Entomology, 20, 175-194.
  • 9Claridge, M.F. and de Vrijer, P.W.F. (1994) Reproductive behavior: The role of acoustic signals in species recognition and speciation. Planthoppers: Their Ecology and Management (eds. R.F. Dermo & T.J. Perfect), pp. 216-233. Chapman& Hall, New York.
  • 10Clary, D.O. and Wolstenholme, D.R. (1985) The ribosomal RNA genes of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Nucleic Acids Research, 13, 4029-4045.

同被引文献9

  • 1Dijkstra E, Rubio J M, Post R J. Resolving relationships over a wide taxonomic range in Delphacidae (Homoptera) using the COI gene[J]. Systematic Entomology, 2003,28 ( 1 ) : 89-100.
  • 2Tam C K, Webb J C. Dispersion-relation-preserving schemes for computational aeroacoustics [ J ]. J Computional Physics, 1993, 107:262-281.
  • 3Berger M, Jameson A. Automatic adaptive grid refine ment for the euler equations [J]. AIAA J, 1985, 23:561.
  • 4Holmes D G, Conner S. Solution of the 2D NavierStokes equations on unstructured adaptive grids [ A ].In: AIAA 9th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference [C], 1989.
  • 5Lockard D P, Brentner K S, Atkins H L. Highaccuracy algorithms for computational aeroacoustics [J].J AIAA, 1995, 33:321-329.
  • 6Tam C K W, Webb J C, Dong Z. A study of the short wave components in computational acoustics [ J ]. Journal of Computational Acoustics, 1993, 1:1-30.
  • 7Bjorn Engquist, Per Lotstedt, Bjorn Sjogreen. Nonlinear filters for efficient shock computation [ J ].Mathematics of Computation, 1989, 52:509-537.
  • 8Patterson M T, TamCKW, ReddyN N. Computational aeroacoustics technology for jet screech phenomena[R]. Prepared by Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Co Marietta, Georgia, 30063, 1998.
  • 9Nan Song,Aiping Liang.The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Geisha distinctissima (Hemiptera: Flatidae) and comparison with other hemipteran insects[J].Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica,2009,41(3):206-216. 被引量:7

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部