期刊文献+

参麦注射液防治晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗不良反应的临床观察 被引量:28

Clinical Observation on Shenmai Injection in Preventing and Treating Adverse Reaction of Chemotherapy on Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察参麦注射液防治晚期非小细胞肺癌患者化疗引起不良反应的作用。方法将45例Ⅲb~Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者随机分为治疗组(参麦注射液加化疗)和对照组(单纯化疗),均治疗3个周期,进行相关比较。结果治疗组和对照组的近期疗效在统计学上无明显差异(P>0.05),在Karnofsky评分、体重方面,两组比较差异均有显著性(P<0.05)。不良反应方面,治疗组在白细胞、血红蛋白减少方面程度低于对照组(P<0.05);而血小板减少、恶心呕吐、肝肾功能损害发生率,虽然治疗组均低于对照组,但两组比较,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论参麦注射液不影响晚期非小细胞肺癌患者化疗疗效,且能够提高生存质量、增加体重、减轻化疗的不良反应,一定程度上提高机体对化疗的耐受性。 Objective To observe the efficacy of Shenmai Injection (SI) in preventing and treating adverse reation of chemotherapy on advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Forty-five patients with NSCLC in Ⅲ b-Ⅳ stage were randomly divided into two groups, the control group treated with chemotherapy alone and the treated group with chemotherapy and SI. The therapeutic efficacy were evaluated after 3 treatment cycles. Results There was no significant difference in short-term effect between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05), while it showed remarkable difference in Karnofsky scoring and body weight (P 〈 0.05). The treated group showed a better effect than the control group in reducing adverse reaction, such as decrease of leucocyte and hemoglobin (P 〈 0.05), while in the aspects of improving thrombocytopenia and the reducing occurrence of nausea/vomitting and alleviating injury of liver and kidney function, it only showed the lower value in the treat- ed group, but with no significant difference as compared with the control group (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion SI could not raise the efficacy of chemotherapy on NSCLC, but improve the quality of life, raise the body weight of patients and alleviate adverse reaction of chemotherapy as myelosuppression so as to improve the tolerance of organism to chemotherapy.
出处 《中国中西医结合杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期550-552,共3页 Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 参麦 化疗 不良反应 non-small cell lung cancer Shenmai Injection chemotherapy adverse reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

  • 1张建纲,兰胜民,程英串,布浩,郭汝元.参麦注射液对恶性肿瘤放、化疗减毒作用的随机研究[J].肿瘤研究与临床,1996,8(2):107-108. 被引量:4
  • 2周成英,曾宪文.参麦液配合化疗治疗肺癌20例[J].南京中医药大学学报,1996,12(4):40-41. 被引量:2
  • 3韩萍 陈拯民.含人参皂甙Rg3的药物可选择性抑制癌细胞[J].国外医药:植物药分册,1994,9(2):89-89.
  • 4Copas J , Shi JQ. Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis [J]. Biostatistics, 2000; 1 (3): 247 -262
  • 5Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary [J ]. Control Clin Trials,1996; 17(1): 1-12
  • 6Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, Tugwell P, Klassen TP. Does quality of reports of randomized trails affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses[J]. Lancet, 1998; 352(9 128): 609-613
  • 7寒川庆一 山下秀之 松田秀秋 等.高速液体クロマトグラつィ一によゐ各种药用人参中サポニの一齐分析[J].药学杂志,1995,115(3):241-249.
  • 8Kitagaawa I, Akedo H, Shinkai K, et al. Inhibition of tumor cell invasi on and metastasis by ginsenosis Rg3. Ginseng Rev, 1995, 16:16-20.
  • 9Shinkai K, Akedo H, Mukai M, et al. Inhibition of in vitro tumor cell i nvasion by ginsenoside Rg3. Jpn J Cancer Res, 1996,87:357-362.
  • 10Mochizuki M, Yoo YC, Matsuzawa K, et al. Inhibitory effect of tumor met as tasis in micebysaponin, ginsenoside-Rb2, 20(R)-and 20(S)-ginsenoside-Rg3, ofredg inseng. Biol. Pharm, Bull, 1995, 18(9):1197-1202.

共引文献249

同被引文献331

引证文献28

二级引证文献216

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部