期刊文献+

大学排行榜之困 被引量:3

The Dilemma of Ranking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大学排行榜在全球各地风靡一时,在21世纪充满竞争、面向市场的学术界,大学排名势所难免,但因评选方法存在诸多缺陷以及排行榜自身的原因,大学排名活动已招致多方批评。排行榜存在的问题跟实践有关,而与原则无关,要解决这些问题,首先应确立公众普遍认可的排名原则,而为这些原则提供合适的衡量办法也必不可少。 Rankings of universities are the rage in the world. In the competitive and market-oriented academic world in the 21st century,rankings are inevitable. But they are widely criticized for questionable or flawed methods as well as for the concept itself. In order to solve the problems,creating generally agreed criteria that can be used may be the first step,and providing appropriate ways of measuring is also necessary.
出处 《世界教育信息》 2006年第6期28-29,共2页 Journal of World Education
关键词 排行榜 基本原理 竞争 原则 测评 透明度 ranking rationale competition criteria measure transparency
  • 相关文献

同被引文献19

  • 1颜丙峰,吕朝晖.对我国大学排行榜评价的几点质疑[J].石油大学学报(社会科学版),2004,20(4):99-102. 被引量:9
  • 2蔡莉,蔡言厚,田金山.中国校友会大学排行榜的理论与实践[J].现代大学教育,2006,22(1):75-79. 被引量:6
  • 3亚历克斯.埃舍尔,马斯莫.萨维诺,王亚敏,侯书栋,李立国.差异的世界:大学排名的全球调查[J].清华大学教育研究,2006,27(5):1-10. 被引量:24
  • 4邱均平.大学排行榜本来就是一家之言[EB/OL].http://real.v.ifeng.com/vplay/ifeng/20090531/67310.shtml,2005-05-13.
  • 5大学排名五花八门,有17个排名机构30多不同类型[EB/OL].http://edu.gog.com.cn/system/2007/08/17/010112157.shtml,2007-08-17.
  • 6Terenzini & Pascarella. Living with Myths: Undergraduate Education in America. Change, 1994, Vol. 26( 1 ):28-32.
  • 7Valerie Strauss. U.S. News's College Rankings Face Competition and Criticism. The Washington Post,2007,August 17.
  • 8Ninavan Dyke. Twenty Years of University Report Cards. Higher Education in Europe, 2005, Vol.30 (2): 103-125.
  • 9Maarja Soo & David Dill. The CHE University Ranking in Germany. [ EB/OL ].http://www.unc.edu/ppaq/docs/CHE_formatted.pdf, 2007.
  • 10Gero Federkeil. The Lack of a National Policy Regime of Quality Assurance in Germany Implications and Alternatives. Higher Education Management and Policy, 2003,Vol.15(2):63-72.

引证文献3

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部