α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病的系统评价(英文)

Alpha-glucosidase Inhibitors for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus:A Systematic Review

目的评价α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病患者的效果。方法检索Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CurrentContents、LILACS在研试验数据库,主题为α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂的综述的参考文献,并联系纳入试验的专家与实施者。最近检索日期为2003年月12月(CurrentContents)和2003年4月(其他数据库)。纳入α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂单一疗法与其它干预比较,治疗2型糖尿病疗程至少12周的随机对照试验,并且试验至少包括以下结局之一:病死率、患病率、生活质量、血糖控制、血脂、胰岛素水平、体重、不良事件。两名评价者独立阅读所有摘要,评价质量并提取数据,分歧通过协商解决或由第三位评价者裁决。由一位统计学家在对提取数据输入数据库时进行检查。我们尽量联系所有作者以核实数据。结果共纳入41个试验、8130例受试者,其中30个针对阿卡波糖,7个针对米格列醇,1个针对优格列波糖,还有3个为不同α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂间的比较。绝大多数研究疗程为24周,仅有2个研究超过1年。与安慰剂相比,阿卡波糖血糖控制效果更好:糖化血红蛋白–0.8%[95%CI(–0.9,–0.7)],空腹血糖–1.1mmol/L[95%CI(–1.4,–0.9)],负荷血糖–2.3mmol/L[95%CI(–2.7,–1.9)],阿卡波糖对糖化血红蛋白的作用呈非剂量依赖。我们发现其可降低负荷胰岛素,但对血脂和体重未见临床相关的作用。不良反应主要来自胃肠道且与剂量相关。相对于磺脲,阿卡波糖将空腹和负荷胰岛素水平分别降低至–24.8pmol/L[95%CI(–43.3,–6.3)]和–133.2pmol/L[95%CI(–184.5,–81.8)],但阿卡波糖引起的不良反应更多。结论关于α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂是否影响2型糖尿病患者的病死率和患病率仍不清楚。相反,其对血糖控制或胰岛素水平作用明显,对血脂和体重的作用差异无统计学意义。α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂更长疗程的效果仍不确定。阿卡波糖剂量超过50mg(TID)时不能进一步影响糖化血红蛋白水平,不良反应反而更多,与磺脲相比,α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂降低了空腹和负荷胰岛素水平,但在血糖控制和不良反应方面存在不利影响。

Objectives To assess the effects of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Method We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, LILACS, databases of ongoing trials, reference lists of reviews on the topic of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and we contacted experts and manufacturers for additional trials. Date of most recent search： December 2003 （Current Contents） and April 2003 （other databases）. Randomised controlled trials of at least 12 weeks duration comparing alpha-glucosidase inhibitor monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes with any other intervention and that included at least one of the following outcomes： mortality, morbidity, quality of life, glycemic control, lipids, insulin levels, body weight, adverse events. Two reviewers read all abstracts, assessed quality and extracted data independently. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus or by the judgement of a third reviewer. A statistician checked all extracted data entrance in the database. We attempted to contact all authors for data clarification. Results We included 41 trials （8 130 participants）, 30 investigated acarbose, seven miglitol, one trial voglibose and three trials compared different alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. Study duration was 24 weeks in most cases and only two studies lasted amply longer than one year. We found only few data on mortality, morbidity and quality of life. Acarbose had a clear effect on glycemic control compared to placebo： glycated haemoglobin -0.77% （95% confidence interval -0.90 to -0.64）, fasting blood glucose 1.1 mmol/L （95% confidence interval -1.4 to -0.9）, post-load blood glucose -2.32 mmol/L （95% confidence interval 2.73 to -1.92）. The effect on glycated haemoglobin by acarbose was not dose-dependent. We found a decreasing effect on post-load insulin and no clinically relevant effects on lipids or body weight. Adverse effects were mostly of gastro-intestinal origin and dose dependent. Compared to sulphonylurea, acarbose decreased fasting and post-load insulin levels by -24.8 pmol/L （95% confidence interval -43.3 to -6.3） and -133.2 pmol/L （95% confidence interval -184.5 to-81.8） respectively and acarbose caused more adverse effects. Conclusions It remains unclear whether alpha-glucosidase inhibitors influence mortality or morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. Conversely, they have a significant effect on glycemic control and insulin levels, but no statistically significant effect on lipids and body weight. These effects are less sure when alphaglucosidase inhibitors are used for a longer duration. Acarbose dosages higher than 50 mg TID offer noadditional effect on glycated haemoglobin but more adverse effects instead. Compared to sulphonylurea, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors lower fasting and post-load insulin levels and have an inferior profile regarding glycemic control and adverse effects.