期刊文献+

基于不同粒度语言判断矩阵的群决策方法 被引量:46

Approach to group decision making with multi-granularity linguistic comparison matrices
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对具有不同粒度语言判断矩阵形式偏好信息的群决策问题,提出了一种基于二元语义信息处理的群集结与方案优选方法.在该方法中,首先给出了不同粒度语言判断矩阵一致化为由基本语言评价集表示的二元语义形式的方法;然后基于二元语义的T-OWA算子,将各决策者给出的偏好信息集结为群的偏好并进行方案的优选.最后给出了一个算例. With respect to group decision making problems with multi-granularity linguistic comparison matrices, a new approach based on two-tuple linguistic representation to group aggregation and alternative selection is proposed. In the approach, firstly, the computational formulae are given to uniform the multi-granularity linguistic comparison matrices into the form of two-tuple linguistic representation denoted by basic linguistic term set. Then, based on T-OWA operator, the preference information provided by every decision maker is aggregated into group preference and most desirable alternative is selected. Finally, an example is used to illustrate the use of the proposed approach.
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期249-253,共5页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 国家杰出青年科学基金资助项目(70525002) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(7037105070301008) 教育部高等学校优秀青年教师教学科研奖励计划资助项目(教人司[2002]123) 国家教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20040145018) 辽宁省博士启动基金资助项目(20041019)
关键词 群决策 不同粒度 语言判断矩阵 二元语义 T-OWA算子 集结 方案优选 group decision making multi-granularity linguistic comparison matrix two-tuple T-OWA operator aggregation alternative selection
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Hwang C L, Lin M J. Group Decision Making Under Multiple Criteria[ M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987.
  • 2Herrera F, Martinez L. A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multi-granularity hierarchical hnguistic contexts in multiexpert decision-making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, 2001, 31(2): 227-234.
  • 3Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L. A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic terms sets in decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114(1): 43-58.
  • 4Herrera F, Martinez L. A 2-tuple fuzzy hnguistic representation model for computing with words[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8(6): 746-752.
  • 5Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A sequential selection process in group decision-making with linguistic assessments[J]. Information Sciences, 1995, 85: 223-229.
  • 6Marimin M, Umano M, Hatono I, et al. Linguistic labels for expressing fuzzy preference relations in fuzzy group decision making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, 1998, 28(2): 205-218.
  • 7Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 78(1): 73-87.
  • 8Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G. A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 1997, 27(1): 126-132.
  • 9Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A model of consensus in group decision making under hnguistic assessments[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 79(1): 73-87.
  • 10Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 115(1): 67-82.

同被引文献479

引证文献46

二级引证文献347

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部