摘要
为了对理工类硕士研究生论文的总体质量有一明确的认识,在浙江省4家高校学报中随机抽取硕士研究生论文的专家审稿单178份作为调查样,抽取非研究生论文(大多为高校教师的论文)的专家审稿单353份作为对照样,调查统计了2组论文专家审稿的评定结果.采用模糊评判的方法,对2组论文的质量进行了量化评判和比较.结果显示研究生组总得分比对照组低4.88%,差距不大.表明理工类硕士研究生论文的总体质量水平能达到在学术期刊上发表的要求.
In order to investigate the quality of postgraduate＇s sci-tech thesises, 178 reviews of postgraduate thesises were randomly selected from 4 academic journals as investigating samples, 353 reviews of non-postgraduate thesises were selected as comparing samples. By Evaluating quantitatively the quality of the both group thesis by Fuzzy judgement method, the results showed that the quality points of postgraduate thesises was less than that of the non-postgyaduate＇s, but difference （ -4.88% ） is small. It was suggested that the postgraduate＇s thesises were about equal quality in academic journals.
出处
《浙江师范大学学报（自然科学版）》
CAS
2006年第3期357-360,共4页
Journal of Zhejiang Normal University:Natural Sciences
关键词
研究生论文
质量评价
调查
学术期刊
postgraduate＇s thesis
quality evaluation
investigation
academic journals
