摘要
针对《T》文所说的线计法存在忽略4.5ф以下的细颗粒,导致曲线形态畸变,提出用粗略筛折法“杂基处理”来修改线计法资料,使其与筛析资料形态符合等问题,本文分析了《T》文所示资料,通过正反两方面的对比、剖析,证明问题的产生是由于其计量方法不当,与抽样方法本身无关,线计法资料是可信赖的。粗略筛析法“杂基处理”的提出是不必要的。而且无论在理论上、方法上都存在许多问题,它是粒度计量错误基础上畸生出来的产物。因此,不宜采用。
Currently there are some argument to the data by line measurement and to the treatment of matxices.It have concerned that the method of grain size analysis have been used rightly and data have been reality and reliability.Therefore we must discuss the dissertation'T' about the questions of theory.This paper that has taken throught the analysis of the treatment of matxices and the grain size data of the dissertation 'T' has proved that the grain size of > 4.5φ have been absent and probability curve have been Variation, result from testing rather than by line measurment.Thus the methed has not used on the treatment of matxices of article 'T'.
If only grain size analysis have been systematized and regulatized in sampling, chip, granulometry, tests have been Confirmed that the result by line measuremet is valid and reliable.
出处
《沉积学报》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
1990年第2期135-139,共5页
Acta Sedimentologica Sinica