摘要
为了察看利用单站降雹频数Fs和区域降雹频数Fa制作的两种气候图的频数分布是否一致?我们绘制了该两种气候图,并进行了初步分析。结果表明,在引进了降雹频数凹凸度R,又引进了空间一致性表达式后,在两种降雹频数气候图上,它们高(低)值分布有84%的格点相一致。
Usually, there are two kinds of hail frequency data: One is in the station(Fs) ; another, in a area(Fa). Are their climate distribution map the same? to answer the question, the two climate maps of hail frequency were made with Fs and Fa. Some intercomparisons with each other were done. Firstly concavity (R) in hail frequency was introduced in order to watch the agreement in relative distribution of hail frequency (F) in two climate maps (as F is relative large, R〈-ε; relative less, R〉+ε; saddle). Secondly, spatial agreement was also calculated used formula introduced. Results indicated (at least) 84% of grid numbers (distribution of high or low value) is agreement in two climate maps.
出处
《高原气象》
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第3期525-530,共6页
Plateau Meteorology
基金
科技部科研院所社会公益研究专项课题(2004DIB3J100)资助
关键词
两种降雹频数气候图
降雹频数的凹(凸)度
Two climate maps of different hail frequencies
Concavity (convex) of hail frequency