期刊文献+

歧义在转换生成语法中的研究

Researches on Ambiguity Within TG Grammar Framework
下载PDF
导出
摘要 歧义是人类语言中的普遍现象,仅对歧义句进行描写不利于对歧义句的研究的深入。文章在转换生成语法框架内解释了论元在表层结构的可能线性组合、论元在深层结构的可能组合、逻辑性结构歧义三个方面解析了歧义句形成的原因。论元在句子表层结构或深层结构的可能组合是形成歧义句的一个重要原因,不同的组合形成了不同的歧义解释;管辖与约束理论引进语迹,认为逻辑性歧义句是由于WH-词、量词或否定词有不同的辖域;最简方案以逻辑算子为基础,认为逻辑结构歧义是由于在特征核查中形成的不同的语链。 Ambiguity is one of the common phenomena of any human language. Mere description cannot deepen the study of language. Within the framework of TG-Grammar, the article carries out the semantic interpretations of syntactical ambiguity: possible linear combination of arguments, combination of arguments in deep structure and logical form od ambiguity, and analyses causes of ambiguity. Different possible combinations of arguments in surface structure or deep structure are major causes of forming syntactical ambiguity. Different combinations of arguments result in different interpretation. CB Theory, introducing the concept of trace, argues that logical ambiguity is caused by different scopes of WH words, quantifiers or negative words in the early stage of TG, while MP, based on logical operator, argues that different chains formed in the course of feature checking cause ambiguity.
作者 贾湘柳
出处 《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第2期115-119,共5页 Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
关键词 转换生成语法 歧义 论元组合 逻辑式 语链 TG Grammar ambiguity argument combination logical form chain
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[5]Chomsky,N.A minimalist program for linguistic theory.In K.Hale & S.J.Keyser (eds.) The View From Building 20.Cambridge,Mass.:MIT Press,1993.
  • 2[6]Chomsky,N.The Minimalist Program.Cambridge,Mass.:MIT Press,1995.
  • 3[7]Ernst,T.The Syntax of Adjuncts.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.
  • 4[8]戴曼纯.最简方案框架下的广义左项合并理论研究[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2002.
  • 5[11]May,R.Logical Form:Its Structure and Derivation.Mass.:MIT Press,1985.
  • 6伍雅清.英汉语量词辖域的歧义研究综述[J].当代语言学,2000,2(3):168-182. 被引量:14
  • 7[13]Belletti,A & L.Rizzi.On the psych-verb and the θ-theory,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1988,6:291-352.
  • 8[14]Young-joo & Larson R.Scope interpretation and the syntax of psych -verb.Linguistic Inquiry,1989,20:681-688.
  • 9[15]Huang,James C.-T.(黄正德) Move WH in a language without WH movement.The Linguistic Review,1982a,1:369-416.
  • 10[16]Huang,James C.-T.Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar.Ph.D.dis.MIT,1982b.

二级参考文献117

  • 1何宏华.辖域释义与汉语标记性量词[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,17(S1):1-7. 被引量:5
  • 2伍雅清.特殊疑问句研究[J].现代外语,1999,22(1):75-107. 被引量:15
  • 3邹崇理.话语表现理论述评[J].当代语言学,1998(4):21-32. 被引量:13
  • 4蒋严.语用推理与“都”的句法/语义特征[J].现代外语,1998,21(1). 被引量:116
  • 5陆俭明.周遍性主语及其他[J].中国语文,1986,(3).
  • 6Aoun, J & Yen-Hui A Li. 1991. The interaction of operators [A]. In R Freidin (ed.). Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar [C]. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
  • 7Aoun, J & Yen-Hui A Li. 1993. Syntax of Scope [M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • 8Aoun, J & Yen-Hui A Li. 1989. Constituency and scope [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 141-172.
  • 9Chclnsky, N 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding [M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • 10Chclnsky, N 1993. The minimalist program for linguistic theory [A]. In K Hale & S J Keyser (eds.). The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger [C]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部