期刊文献+

DFR腐蚀影响系数及其试验测定 被引量:10

Theoretical and experimental determination of DFR-corrosion-influence-factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为使腐蚀环境下民机结构疲劳分析的细节疲劳额定值(DFR)方法具有更广泛适用性,对DFR腐蚀影响系数与腐蚀环境的关系进行了研究,将DFR的腐蚀影响系数分解为地面停放腐蚀影响系数和空中腐蚀疲劳影响系数,建立了地面停放腐蚀影响系数与地面停放腐蚀时间的关系,以及空中复杂综合环境腐蚀疲劳影响系数与单一介质环境腐蚀影响系数的关系.通过试验测定了各种典型情况的DFR腐蚀影响系数,试验结果说明DFR腐蚀影响系数随着地面停放腐蚀时间的增加和环境腐蚀性的增强而降低,腐蚀疲劳的影响较停放腐蚀的影响更严重.分析实例具体说明了腐蚀条件下DFR方法的具体步骤和所需数据,并体现出疲劳分析中计及腐蚀影响的必要性. The relationship of detail fatigue rating(DFR)-corrosion-influence-factors and aggressive environments was studied, which makes the DFR method under erosion environments for civil aircraft structures' fatigue analysis more applicable to different structure details and different service environments. The way was established to decompose DFR-corrosion-influence-factor into ground-corrosion- influence-factor and air-corrosion-fatigue-influencefactor. The relationship between ground-corrosion-influence-factor and corrosion time as well as the relationship of perplexing environment corrosion-fatigue-influence-factor and mono-medium corrosion-fatigue-influence-factors were studied. Experiments for typical influence factors testing were conducted and reported. The results show that DFR- corrosion-influence-factors are decreasing as the increasing of ground-corrosion-time and the aggravating of environments causticity. The influence of corrosion fatigue is much serious than that of ground-corrosion. The example of structure fatigue analysis with DFR method under corrosive environment shows the detail steps and data requirements. The analysis indicates that DFR of a given structure is reduced significantly by corrosion, and the influence must be taken into account properly in fatigue analysis.
出处 《北京航空航天大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期639-644,共6页 Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
关键词 疲劳 腐蚀 腐蚀疲劳 试验 民用飞机 细节疲劳额定值 fatigue corrosion corrosion-fatigue experiment civil aircraft detail fatigue rating
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献9

  • 1[7]Ruoxue Zhang, Sankaran Mahadevan. Reliability-based reassessment of corrosion fatigue life[J]. Structural Safty,2001,23:77 ~ 79
  • 2[3]Groner D J. US airforce aging aircraft corrosion[R]. AIAA Paper 97-1364, Washington D C:American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics,1997
  • 3[5]Wanhill R J H, Luccia J J De. An AGARD-coordinated corrosion fatigue cooperative testing programme (CFCTP)[R]. AD-A113731,AGARD-R-695, 1982
  • 4陈一坚.飞机结构耐久性及损伤容限设计手册第二册--飞机结构的疲劳分析[M].西安:航空航天工业部科学设计研究院,1989..
  • 5梁美训 傅惠民.以最大或然估计量作为随机变量的半子样升降法[J].固体力学学报,1986,4:383-387.
  • 6费斌军.长寿命区疲劳强度概率分布参数估计方法[J].固体力学学报,1995,16:31-35.
  • 7Harry F M, Ray A W. Bayesian reliability analysis[M]. new York:Wiley, 1982
  • 8高镇同.疲劳应用统计学[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1986..
  • 9陈勃,鲍蕊,张建宇,费斌军.疲劳强度分布参数的贝叶斯分析[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2003,29(3):233-236. 被引量:4

共引文献24

同被引文献53

引证文献10

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部