“辋川别业”不是园林

"Wangchuan Villa" is not a Garden

从陈铁民先生的现场求证和研究结果来看,唐代《辋川图》和《辋川诗》中的许多景点都不在唐代诗人王维的辋川别业的范围之内。国内园林史学界将《辋川图》和《辋川诗》中的景点作为一个整体来证明“辋川别业”是“别墅园林”或“郊野园林”的证据并不能成立。该文通过对《辋川图》中“辋川居所”与城市园林在“私权边界”、“主人身份”以及周边“自然山水的人工因素”等方面进行对比分析,提出王维的辋川别业和《辋川图》中的辋川居所不但在空间结构上与城市园林有着明显不同,在逻辑关系上也不应被划在园林的范畴之内。

According to the studies of CHEN Tie-rain（1938-）, a famous specialist who researched the poems of Tang Dynasty, most of the landscapes which are described in Wangchuan Painting and Wangchuan Poetry Anthology are not in the ＂Wangchuan villa＂ which belonged to WANG Wei（701-761）, a great poet and painter of Tang Dynasty. The evidence of considering the landscapes which are described in Wangchuan Painting and Wangchuan Poetry Anthology as a whole doesn＇t achieve the result that the ＂Wangchuan villa＂ is a garden. Comparative analysis on ＂Wangchuan residences＂ and city gardens in the respects of the boundary of personal fight, the owner＇ s identity and the artificial factors of environment, the paper holds that ＂Wangchuan villa＂ not only is different with city gardens in the spatial construction but also is not a garden in logic.