摘要
《淮南子·天文训》提出“太昭”说，迄今已越两千年，却一直未获破译。甚至还遭到过清代王引之的武断误校，以致在中国哲学史界和中国科学史界留下错误影响。该文通过考证，追溯了“太昭”说的思想渊源；揭示了“太昭”和“虚”的概念内涵；统一了《淮南子·天文训》宇宙起源模式的两种陈述；对王引之的系列错误论点给予全面否定；并认为，“太昭”说是宇宙起源于光气（发光的气）学说史上一个重要的里程碑。
Proposed more than 2, 000 years ago in Than Wen Xun(Critical Astronomical Interpretation) of Huai Nan Zi(The Book of the Prince of Huainan), the concept ' Tai Zhao' has never been explained correctly. It was even erroneously collated with assertion by Wang Yinzhi, so that a false impression about it was created among the historians of philosophy and science in China.Through textual research, this paper traces the ideological origin of 'Tai Zhao',revealsthe connotation of ' Tai Zhao' and ' Xu Guo', and integrates the two statements concerningthe model of the cosmos.In addition, a series of mistaken views of Wang Yinzhi is negated completely,while the concept ' Tat Zhao' is taken as an important milestone in the historyof the theory which considers the cosmos to be originated from luminous ' Qi'.
出处
《自然科学史研究》
CSCD
1996年第2期97-106,共10页
Studies in The History of Natural Sciences
关键词
淮南子
天文训
太昭
虚Kuo
王引之
宇宙起源
Huai Nan Zi,Tian Wen Xun,Tai Zhao, Xu Guo, Wang Yinzhi, theoryof the cosmos originating from luminous Qi
