论专家法律意见书

On the Expert Legal Opinion Letter

文章通过对专家法律意见书与古今中外相关概念的比较,指出专家法律意见书既不是实然上的证据形式,也不能作为应然上的证据,并从法理和社会意义的角度论证为当事人出具的专家法律意见书不具备存在的合理性。

By comparing the expert legal opinion letter with relevant concepts-ancient and modem, home and abroad, this thesis points out that it is neither evidence as it is, nor evidence as it ought to be, and illustrates that it is of no rationality to provide expert legal opinion letters for parties in a lawsuit when jurisprudential and social significance is concemed.