期刊文献+

概化理论在语言测试新进展中的应用

The Application of Generalizability Theory in the New Context of Language Testing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 概化理论是一种发展较晚但功能全面的现代测试理论,能有效地设计、分析和评估测试项目。直到上个世纪八九十年代,RobertBrennan等人开发了GENOVA等一系列应用软件后,概化理论才在心理和教育测量领域的研究中逐渐受到重视,此后,运用概化理论研究实际问题的项目也逐渐多了起来。概化理论与项目反应理论属于不同的理论范畴,它们的基本假设也有很大的差别。 GT is a broadly defined measurement theory with a relatively short history. In the studies of language testing, Generalizability theory (GT) has been utilised as a powerful instrument and is especially useful in the new context of language testing research. In this article, the authors reviewed the key concepts of GT and the applications of GT in language performance test and criteria-referenced test. Comparisons between GT and Item response theory (IRT), Many-facet Rasch Model (MFRM) in particular, are discussed, along with the prospect of GT development of application.
作者 李智 肖云南
出处 《湖南文理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第3期133-136,共4页 Journal of Hunan University of Arts and Science:Social Science Edition
关键词 概化理论 语言测试 表现性测试 标准参照测试 多侧面Rasch模式 generalizability theory language testing, performance test criteria-referenced test multi-facet Rasch model
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]Bachman,L.F.Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1990.
  • 2陈社育,余嘉元.经典真分数理论与概化理论信度观评析[J].心理学动态,2001,9(3):258-263. 被引量:23
  • 3[4]Brennan,R.Generalizability Theory,Springer-Verlag New York Inc[M].2001.
  • 4[5]Marcoulides G.A.,Generalizability Theory:Picking up Where the Rasch IRT Model leaves off?[M]//In Embreston S.E.et.al (eds),The New Rules of Measurement:What Every Psychologist and Educator shoud Know.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers,1999.
  • 5韩宝成.语言测试的新进展:基于任务的语言测试[J].外语教学与研究,2003,35(5):352-358. 被引量:194
  • 6[7]Bachman,L.F.Generalizability Theory[M]//in Clapham,C.and Corson,D.(eds.).Encyclopaedia of Language and Education,:Volume 7.Kluwer Academic Publishers,1997.
  • 7[8]Yoko,K.Using GENOVA and FACETS to set Multiple Standards on Performance Assessment for Certification in Medical Translation from Japanese into English[J].Language Testing,2004,(21):1-27.
  • 8[9]Bachman,L.F.,B.K.Lynch,& M.Mason.Investigating Variability in Tasks and Rater Judgments in a Performance Test of Foreign Language Speaking[J].Language Testing 1995,(12):238-57.

二级参考文献34

  • 1漆书青,现代教育与心理测量学原理,1998年,9页
  • 2Long, M.H. 1985. A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Tasked-based language teaching[A]. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (eds.).Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition [C]. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • 3Long, M.H. 1991. Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology [A]. In K. de Bot,R. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch (eds.). Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective [ C ].Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • 4Long M.H. & J.M. Norris. 2000. Task-based language teaching and assessment [A]. In M. Byram (eds.).Encyclopedia of Language Teaching [C]. London:Routledge.
  • 5Long, M.H. & P. Robinson. 1998. Focus on form:Theory, research, and practice [A]. In G. Doughty & J. Williams (eds.). Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition [ C ]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • 6McNamara, T.T. 1996. Measuring Second Language Performance [M]. London: Longman.
  • 7McNamara, T.T. 1997. Performance testing [A]. In C. Clapham & D. Corson ( eds. ). Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Volume 7: Language Testing and Assessment [C]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • 8Messick, S. 1989. Validity [A]. In R.L. Linn (eds.).Educational Measurement, 3rd edition [C]. New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
  • 9Norris, J.M., J.D. Brown, T. Hudson & J. Yoshioka. 1998. Designing Second Language Performance Assessments [ M]. (Vol. SLTCC Technical Report # 18). Honolulu: Second Language Teaching and Currictlum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
  • 10Nunna, D. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology[M]. London: Prentice Hall.

共引文献215

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部