干湿疗法各治愈一例特大面积烫伤比较

A Comparison of the Efficacy Between Dry and Moist Burn Therapy for Treating Exceptionally Large Area Scalds

作者于1986及1993年各治疗一例特大面积烫伤患者，分别为95％及98％，Ⅱ度烫伤。一例应用一般治疗方法，一例全程应用MEBT方法，均获愈合，但两者休克期输液量明显不同（后者为前者总量2／3），住院愈合天数，后者较前者缩短，伤后前者并发症较重。两者医药费亦明显不同。后者止病效果好，几乎未用止痛药。

one case scalded to second degree with a scalded area of 65% was treated with conventional dry therapy - while the other one scalded to second degree with a scalded area of 9894 was treated with MEBT. Both of the patients healed- But there were many different points worthy to be noted:1. The total infusion volume at shock stage for moist therapy was only 2;/3 of that for dry therapy.2. The paitent treated with moist therapy had a hospital stay shorter than the one treated with dry therapy.3. The patient treated with dry therapy had complications, while the one treated with moist therapy had not.4. The medical expenses of moist therapy was less than that of dry therapy.5. Moist therapy had analgesic effect so that almost no analgesic agent was needed