论担保物权的期间

On the Period of the Security Interest

我国现行担保法中关于抵押、质押和留置三种担保形式的规定,共同构成了我国现行物权担保制度的核心。然而,在实践过程中,我们发现现行物权担保制度本身存在一些矛盾和不足,有损于其功能的正常发挥。尤其在存续期间的问题上学者之间观点不一,本文论述了我国担保物权中的抵押权、质权、留置权应该有存续期间规定的原因及制度设计。

The regulations of three forms of guarantee--mortgage, impawn and lien-constitute the core of the current guarantee law in our country. However, in practice, we find that there are some conflicts and defects in the guarantee law, which block the normal function and especially lead to the different opinions by some scholars in existing time. This article tries to explain the reasons and institution design of existing time that the mortgage right, impawn right and lien right should have in the security interest in our country.