期刊文献+

Ⅰ、Ⅱ期非小细胞肺癌术后辅助化疗疗效分析

Clinical observation of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery for Stage Ⅰ、Ⅱ non-small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价Ⅰ、Ⅱ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)切除术后辅助化疗的疗效。方法辅助化疗组102例于术后接受3~4周期的化疗,单纯手术组172例患者术后未行化疗。结果辅助化疗组术后复发、转移43例(42.2%),单纯手术组术后复发、转移85例(49.4%),两组比较差别无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。辅助化疗组和单纯手术组的5年生存率分别为45.1%(46/102)和42.4%(73/172),差别无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论对根治切除术后Ⅰ、Ⅱ期NSCLC患者不需常规进行辅助化疗。 Objective To evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery for stage Ⅰ, Ⅱ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods We analysed clinical data in 274 cases of stage Ⅰ, Ⅱ NSCLC undergone resectional surgery. 102 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy after undergone radical surgery (adjuvant chemotherapy group). 172 patients received surgery alone (surgery group). Results The relapse or metastasis rate was 42.2% in the adjuvant chemotherapy group and 49.4% in the surgery group. There was no significant difference between two groups (P 〉 0.05). The 5-year survival rate was 45.1% in the adjuvant chemotherapy group and 42.4% in the surgery group. There was no significant difference between two groups (P 〉 0.05) as well. Conclusion Adjuvant chemotherapy is not a recommended therapy methods for patients with stage Ⅰ、Ⅱ NSCLC.
作者 潘泓 刘德森 茅乃权 左传田 黄鼎铭 谢彤 黄耀元 潘琪 PAN Hong, LUI De-sen, MAO Nai-quan, ZUO Chuan-tian, HUANG Ding-ming, XIE Tong, HUANG Yao-yuan, PAN Qi (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China)
出处 《医学文选》 2006年第3期363-364,共2页 Anthology of Medicine
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 手术治疗 辅助化疗 生存分析 Non-small-cell lung cancer Surgery Adjuvant chemotherapy Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献36

  • 1[1]Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group. Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung caner:a meta-analysis updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trails [J]. BMJ,1995,311:899-909
  • 2[1]Stephens RJ, Fairlamb N, Gower N, et al. The Big Lung Trial (BLT): determining the value of cisplatin-based chemotherapy for all patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preliminary results in the supportive care setting. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2002,21:291a.
  • 3[2]Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study (ELVIS) Group. J Natl Cancer Inst,1999,91(1):66-72.
  • 4[3]Lilenbaum RC, Herndon JE, List M, et al. Single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a CALGB randomized trial of efficacy, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2002,21:1a.
  • 5[4]Scagliotti GV, De Marinis F, Rinaldi M, et al. Phase Ⅲ randomized trial comparing three platinum-based doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol,2002,20(21):4285-4291.
  • 6[5]Fossella FV, DeVore R, Kerr RN, et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol,2000,18(12):2354-2362.
  • 7[6]America Society of Clinical Oncology: Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol,1997,15(8):2996-3018.
  • 8[7]Smith IE, O'Brien ME, Talbot DC, et al. Duration of chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized trial of three versus six courses of mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin. J Clin Oncol,2001,19(5):1336-1343.
  • 9[8]Socinski MA, Schell MJ, Peterman A, et al. Phase Ⅲ trial comparing a defined duration of therapy versus continuous therapy followed by second-line therapy in advanced-stage ⅢB/Ⅳ non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol,2002,20(5):1335-1343.
  • 10[9]Socinski MA, Baggstrom MQ, Hensing TA. Duration of therapy in advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Adv Hemato Oncol,2003,1(1):33-38.

共引文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部